Hemodynamic profiles in treatment-naive arterial hypertension and their clinical implication for treatment choice: an...

Noninvasive thoracic bioimpedance by the HOTMAN System estimates hemodynamic modulators and expresses them as hemodynamic profiles. Aims of this analysis were to describe hemodynamic profiles among treatment-naive hypertensive patients compared with normotensive controls and to investigate whether a hemodynamic-guided choice of therapy improves blood pressure (BP) control within 4 weeks.

This exploratory post hoc analysis used data of a randomized parallel-group trial including 80 outpatients with newly diagnosed arterial hypertension (AHT), randomized to four antihypertensive first-line monotherapies, and 20 age-matched and sex-matched normotensive controls. Hemodynamic profiles were measured at baseline and after four weeks of treatment. On the basis of the hemodynamic profiles, the most appropriate pharmacological treatment was determined retrospectively and patients were categorised to have received concordant (ConTG) or discordant treatment (DisTG).

In the hypertensive group, hypervolemia with vasoconstriction was the predominant hemodynamic profile in 48% of patients and hypervolemia without vasoconstriction in 45%, compared with 15 and 50%, respectively, in the control group. After 4 weeks of treatment, the mean (±SD) 24-h BP was 129.9 (±11.0)/81.5 (±8.0) mmHg in the DisTG vs. 133.9 (±12.3)/84.0 (±9.1) mmHg in the ConTG (P = 0.158/0.222). The mean 24-h BP reductions were -9.7 (±10.1)/-5.0 (±6.2) mmHg in the DisTG and -12.4 (±14.8)/-6.9(±6.9) mmHg in the ConTG (P = 0.353/0.223). After 4 weeks of treatment, the BP control rate was 53.7% (43/80) among all, 55.7% (29/52) in the DisTG and 48% (12/25) in the ConTG (P = 0.628).

Our findings do not support the hypothesis that personalized treatment initiation based on hemodynamic profiles improves BP control in newly diagnosed hypertensive outpatients.