Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 25, 2025

Use of a Rat Model to Study Ventral Abdominal Hernia Repair
05:47

Use of a Rat Model to Study Ventral Abdominal Hernia Repair

Published on: October 2, 2017

9.6K

Developing a Hernia Mesh Tissue Integration Index Using a Porcine Model-A Pilot Study.

Paul Patiniott1,2, Brendan Stagg3, Alex Karatassas1,2

  • 1Department of Surgery, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

Frontiers in Surgery
|December 16, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Beginning of the End?

ANZ journal of surgery·2026
Same author

The Role of Non-Technical Errors in Hip Fracture Mortality: A National Retrospective Cohort Study.

ANZ journal of surgery·2026
Same author

Extended validation of the mesh integration (MINT) index: a 1-year porcine study.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same author

Changes in Surgical Admissions and Outcomes During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Exploration of the Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality (ANZASM).

ANZ journal of surgery·2026
Same author

Looking Good From the End of Bed: Surgical Clinical Intuition.

ANZ journal of surgery·2026
Same author

Differentiating scar behaviour: Transepidermal water loss in delayed healing and skin graft scars.

Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries·2026

This pilot study developed a Mesh Tissue Integration (MTI) Index using a porcine model to compare hernia mesh products. The index assesses tissue ingrowth, fibrosis, and adhesion, aiding surgeons in selecting optimal meshes for better patient outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Surgical Innovation
  • Veterinary Medicine

Background:

  • Choosing the right hernia mesh is challenging for surgeons.
  • Patient inflammatory response significantly impacts hernia repair outcomes.
  • Poor mesh integration can lead to complications like infection, fibrosis, and pain.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a numerical Mesh Tissue Integration (MTI) Index.
  • To create a standardized model for comparing hernia mesh products based on biological characteristics.
  • To aid surgeons in evidence-based mesh selection for improved patient-centered care.

Main Methods:

  • A porcine model was used to evaluate eight hernia mesh products and two controls.
  • Meshes were implanted in subrectus and intraperitoneal planes.
Keywords:
abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR)biological integrationherniahernia meshhernia repair meshimplantable deviceporcine (pig) modeltissue integration

More Related Videos

Tissue Engineering of the Intestine in a Murine Model
08:45

Tissue Engineering of the Intestine in a Murine Model

Published on: December 1, 2012

15.2K
Development of a Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Rat Model
08:58

Development of a Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Rat Model

Published on: August 17, 2022

4.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 25, 2025

Use of a Rat Model to Study Ventral Abdominal Hernia Repair
05:47

Use of a Rat Model to Study Ventral Abdominal Hernia Repair

Published on: October 2, 2017

9.6K
Tissue Engineering of the Intestine in a Murine Model
08:45

Tissue Engineering of the Intestine in a Murine Model

Published on: December 1, 2012

15.2K
Development of a Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Rat Model
08:58

Development of a Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Rat Model

Published on: August 17, 2022

4.8K
  • Explanted specimens underwent macroscopic, histologic, and biomechanical analysis at 2 and 4 weeks.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant differences in Mesh Tissue Integration (MTI) were observed between meshes at 2 and 4 weeks.
    • Meshes implanted in the subrectus plane showed greater adhesion strength and integration than those in the intraperitoneal plane.
    • The MTI Index effectively differentiated mesh performance.

    Conclusions:

    • This study proposes a novel, standardized biological model for assessing hernia mesh integration.
    • The developed MTI Index is a robust tool for comparing mesh products.
    • This model can inform improved mesh selection for complex hernia repairs and abdominal wall reconstruction.