Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 25, 2025

Automated Modular High Throughput Exopolysaccharide Screening Platform Coupled with Highly Sensitive Carbohydrate Fingerprint Analysis
Published on: April 11, 2016
Acarbose bioequivalence: Exploration of eligible protocol design
Linling Que1, Kai Huang1, Ying Ding1
1Drug Clinical Trial Institution, Wuxi People's Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi Jiangsu, China.
This study determined optimal pharmacodynamic (PD) endpoints for acarbose bioequivalence (BE) studies in Chinese volunteers. A 2x50mg dose with concomitant sucrose and acarbose administration, using a rectifying method, is recommended for acarbose BE evaluation.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Pharmacy
- Drug Bioequivalence
Background:
- Acarbose, a poorly absorbed alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, acts locally in the gut.
- Pharmacodynamic (PD) endpoints are preferred over pharmacokinetic (PK) endpoints for evaluating acarbose bioequivalence (BE).
- Optimal protocols for acarbose BE studies using PD endpoints require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify an optimal protocol for establishing acarbose bioequivalence (BE) in healthy Chinese volunteers using pharmacodynamic (PD) endpoints.
- To explore appropriate dosing time/dose and PD parameters for acarbose BE evaluation.
Main Methods:
- Three pilot studies were conducted in healthy Chinese subjects using crossover designs.
- Study 1 assessed dosing time (concomitant vs. 10-min pre-administration of sucrose and acarbose).
- Study 2 identified optimal acarbose dose (1x50mg, 2x50mg, or 3x50mg).
- Study 3 compared test (T) and reference (R) drugs (2x50mg) to determine BE and intra-individual variation.
Main Results:
- Concomitant administration of sucrose and acarbose was found appropriate.
- The optimal dose for acarbose BE studies was determined to be 2x50mg.
- The rectifying method effectively distinguished between formulations, with geometric mean ratios for Cmax, AUC0-2h, and AUC0-4h at 90.06%, 84.55%, and 84.21% respectively.
- Intra-individual variation was approximately 21%, suggesting a required sample size of 55 for the pivotal study.
Conclusions:
- A randomized, balanced, two-way crossover design is suitable for acarbose BE evaluation.
- Concomitant administration of sucrose and acarbose at a 2x50mg dose, utilizing the rectifying method, is recommended.
- The recommended protocol and sample size of 55 provide a basis for future acarbose BE studies.
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Bioequivalence: Overview
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers
Bioavailability Study Design: Absolute Versus Relative Bioavailability
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies

