Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

12.8K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
12.8K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

3.3K
3.3K
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II01:17

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II

406
The Wald-Wolfowitz runs test, commonly referred to as the runs test, is a nonparametric test used to assess the randomness of ordered data. The test evaluates the number of runs, which are consecutive sequences of similar elements within the data. If the number of runs is significantly higher or lower than expected, the data is considered non-random, indicating a detectable pattern or structure.
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and 0s. In...
406
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I01:17

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I

821
The Wald-Wolfowitz test, also known as the runs test, is a nonparametric statistical test used to assess the randomness of a sequence of two different types of elements (e.g., positive/negative values, successes/failures). It examines whether the order of the elements in a sequence is random or if there is a pattern or trend present. This nonparametric test applies to any ordered data despite the population and sample data distribution, even if a higher sample size is available.
The test works...
821

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

LT-FGRS: a unifying R-package for the estimation of family-based genetic liabilities at population-scale.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Changes in Genetic Contributions to ASD and ADHD by Year of Diagnosis.

JAMA psychiatry·2026
Same author

Borderline personality disorder and other psychiatric, somatic, and behavioral conditions: a nationwide family study.

Translational psychiatry·2026
Same author

Association between IL-6 and hs-CRP and Cardiovascular Risk in Clinically Relevant Subgroups.

European journal of preventive cardiology·2026
Same author

Automatic detection of n-degree family members.

Frontiers in genetics·2025
Same author

As rates of ASD and ADHD rise, genetic contributions fall: Evidence for widening diagnostic criteria.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2025
Same journal

3DICE: Interpretable 3D Cross-Modal Learning for Drug-Target Interaction Prediction and Large-Scale Drug Discovery.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

KASSPer: Kinase Active Site Structure Prediction using Protein and Ligand Language Models and Its Application to Virtual Screening.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

IDR searcher: a search engine solution for public image resources.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

KCFtools: Rapid alignment-free method for introgression screening and GWAS using k-mer profiles.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Meta2DB: Curated shotgun metagenomic feature sets and metadata for health state prediction.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

conMItion: an R package adjusting confounding factors for associations in multi-omics.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 25, 2025

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.3K

LDpred2: better, faster, stronger.

Florian Privé1, Julyan Arbel2, Bjarni J Vilhjálmsson1,3

  • 1National Centre for Register-Based Research, Aarhus University, Aarhus 8210, Denmark.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
|December 16, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

LDpred2, an improved polygenic score method, enhances predictive accuracy and robustness over LDpred1. It outperforms other methods, offering more precise genetic predictions for complex traits.

More Related Videos

Single Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction for Comprehensive and Simultaneous Detection of Mutations in Hotspot Regions
08:23

Single Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction for Comprehensive and Simultaneous Detection of Mutations in Hotspot Regions

Published on: September 25, 2018

13.7K
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

363

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 25, 2025

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.3K
Single Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction for Comprehensive and Simultaneous Detection of Mutations in Hotspot Regions
08:23

Single Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction for Comprehensive and Simultaneous Detection of Mutations in Hotspot Regions

Published on: September 25, 2018

13.7K
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

363

Area of Science:

  • Human genetics
  • Statistical genetics

Background:

  • Polygenic scores are crucial in human genetics research.
  • LDpred is a widely used method for deriving polygenic scores.
  • Existing limitations in LDpred can impact predictive performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Introduce LDpred2, an advanced version of the LDpred method.
  • Address limitations of the previous LDpred version.
  • Enhance the accuracy and robustness of polygenic score prediction.

Main Methods:

  • Developed LDpred2 with 'sparse' and 'auto' options for improved parameter learning.
  • Benchmarked LDpred2 against LDpred1 using simulated and real genetic data.
  • Compared LDpred2 performance against other state-of-the-art polygenic score methods.

Main Results:

  • LDpred2 demonstrated substantial improvements in robustness and predictive accuracy over LDpred1.
  • LDpred2 achieved a higher mean AUC (65.1%) across 8 real traits compared to lassosum (63.8%), PRS-CS (62.9%), and SBayesR (61.5%).
  • Genome-wide application of LDpred2 yielded more accurate polygenic scores than per-chromosome analysis.

Conclusions:

  • LDpred2 offers superior performance for polygenic score prediction.
  • The new 'sparse' and 'auto' options enhance the method's flexibility and accuracy.
  • LDpred2 represents a significant advancement in polygenic score methodology for human genetics research.