Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test01:30

Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test

579
Gastrointestinal (GI) diagnostic studies are pivotal in confirming, ruling out, diagnosing, or staging various diseases, including cancers. Following diagnosis, allocating time for discussions with the patient and providing informational resources is crucial. Diagnostic assessments of the GI tract often occur in outpatient settings like endoscopy suites or GI labs. Preparation for these tests may include dietary restrictions, fasting, liquid bowel preparations, laxatives, enemas, and the...
579

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ionizable guanidine-based lipid nanoparticle for targeted mRNA delivery and cancer immunotherapy.

Science advances·2025
Same author

Collision risk analysis in the merging area of interchanges using Monte Carlo traffic simulation.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Direct Cytosolic Uptake of Cell Penetrating Peptides with Shortened Sidechains.

Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology·2025
Same author

Isolation ssDNA aptamers specific for both live and viable but nonculturable state <i>Vibrio vulnificus</i> using whole bacteria-SEILEX technology.

RSC advances·2022
Same author

Distinguishing Glioblastoma Subtypes by Methylation Signatures.

Frontiers in genetics·2020
Same author

Rapid and sensitive detection of nodularin-R in water by a label-free BLI aptasensor.

The Analyst·2018
Same journal

Mesenchymal stem cells-derived extracellular vesicles as a novel drug delivery carrier: engineering strategies and clinical safety estimation.

Frontiers in molecular biosciences·2026
Same journal

Preparation and analysis of tobacco glycosides, and the relationship between glycoside aglycones and pyrolysis products: a review.

Frontiers in molecular biosciences·2026
Same journal

Peritoneal metastasis in pancreatic cancer: molecular mechanisms, microenvironmental remodeling, and emerging intraperitoneal interventions.

Frontiers in molecular biosciences·2026
Same journal

Insights from LC-MS-based cerebrospinal fluid metabolomics in tuberculous meningitis.

Frontiers in molecular biosciences·2026
Same journal

Emerging roles of Notch signaling in the tumor microenvironment of digestive system cancers.

Frontiers in molecular biosciences·2026
Same journal

Adenosine metabolism as an endogenous protective mechanism in response to upstream ischemic injury.

Frontiers in molecular biosciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 25, 2025

Quantitative Mass Spectrometric Profiling of Cancer-cell Proteomes Derived From Liquid and Solid Tumors
08:08

Quantitative Mass Spectrometric Profiling of Cancer-cell Proteomes Derived From Liquid and Solid Tumors

Published on: February 27, 2015

16.7K

Identifying Robust Microbiota Signatures and Interpretable Rules to Distinguish Cancer Subtypes.

Lei Chen1,2, Zhandong Li3, Tao Zeng4

  • 1School of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.

Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
|December 17, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study identifies key microorganisms and predictive models for cancer classification. It reveals new microbiome signatures and rules for cancer discrimination, advancing tumor etiology research.

Keywords:
cancer typedecision treemachine learning algorithmmicrobiotarules

More Related Videos

Characterization and Functional Prediction of Bacteria in Ovarian Tissues
10:12

Characterization and Functional Prediction of Bacteria in Ovarian Tissues

Published on: October 23, 2021

3.0K
A Clinical Metaproteomics Workflow Implemented within Galaxy Bioinformatics Platform to Analyze Host-Microbiome Interactions Underlying Human Disease
09:52

A Clinical Metaproteomics Workflow Implemented within Galaxy Bioinformatics Platform to Analyze Host-Microbiome Interactions Underlying Human Disease

Published on: January 10, 2025

975

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 25, 2025

Quantitative Mass Spectrometric Profiling of Cancer-cell Proteomes Derived From Liquid and Solid Tumors
08:08

Quantitative Mass Spectrometric Profiling of Cancer-cell Proteomes Derived From Liquid and Solid Tumors

Published on: February 27, 2015

16.7K
Characterization and Functional Prediction of Bacteria in Ovarian Tissues
10:12

Characterization and Functional Prediction of Bacteria in Ovarian Tissues

Published on: October 23, 2021

3.0K
A Clinical Metaproteomics Workflow Implemented within Galaxy Bioinformatics Platform to Analyze Host-Microbiome Interactions Underlying Human Disease
09:52

A Clinical Metaproteomics Workflow Implemented within Galaxy Bioinformatics Platform to Analyze Host-Microbiome Interactions Underlying Human Disease

Published on: January 10, 2025

975

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Oncology
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Cancer etiology involves genetic and environmental factors, but the role of microorganisms in tumorigenesis remains incompletely understood.
  • Previous research on microbe-cancer links is limited to single microbe-cancer subtype associations, lacking comprehensive microbiome analysis.
  • The specific contribution of the microbiome to tumorigenesis requires further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically analyze microbiome data from cancer patients and controls to identify key microbial players in tumorigenesis.
  • To develop interpretable quantitative predictive models for cancer classification based on microbiome signatures.
  • To compare different bioinformatics tools for robust microbiome analysis in cancer research.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic microbiome analysis of blood and cancer-associated tissues from public databases.
  • Application of multiple machine learning methods for developing quantitative predictive models.
  • Comparative analysis of Kraken and SHOGUN tools for microbiome profiling and feature identification.

Main Results:

  • Identification of several core regulatory microorganisms contributing to the classification of multiple tumor subtypes.
  • Establishment of quantitative, interpretable predictive models for cancer discrimination using microbiome data.
  • Comparison of optimal features and classification rules derived from different microbiome analysis pipelines.

Conclusions:

  • The study identified novel microbiome signatures and interpretable classification rules for cancer discrimination.
  • This research provides a methodological comparison for robust cancer microbiome analyses.
  • Findings promote a deeper understanding of tumor etiology at the microbiome level.