Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Proofreading01:43

Proofreading

58.5K
Overview
58.5K
Feedback Inhibition00:46

Feedback Inhibition

56.3K
Biochemical reactions are occurring constantly in cells, converting starting substances to different products, usually with the help of enzymes that speed the reactions. Without enzymes, it would take far too long for most reactions to occur to be useful to the cell!
56.3K
Feedback Loops01:01

Feedback Loops

62.4K
In most cases, excessive hormone production is prevented by negative feedback—a loop that starts with a stimulus inducing the release of a particular substance, like a hormone, to maintain a certain level before triggering a signal that results in a decrease in further release of the hormone.
62.4K
Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

8.2K
In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
8.2K
Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

10.3K
Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
10.3K
Law of Segregation01:49

Law of Segregation

76.1K
When crossing pea plants, Mendel noticed that one of the parental traits would sometimes disappear in the first generation of offspring, called the F1 generation, and could reappear in the next generation (F2). He concluded that one of the traits must be dominant over the other, thereby causing masking of one trait in the F1 generation. When he crossed the F1 plants, he found that 75% of the offspring in the F2 generation had the dominant phenotype, while 25% had the recessive phenotype.
76.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

First Report of Staged Adaptive Frameless Stereotactic Radiosurgery in 3 "Pulses" to Salvage Brain Metastases that Failed Previous Radiosurgery.

Neurosurgery·2026
Same author

Tocilizumab for severe immune checkpoint inhibitor myopathy-myocarditis: acute and long-term outcomes.

Journal of neurology·2026
Same author

Photon absorption remote sensing (PARS): comprehensive absorption imaging enabling label-free biomolecule characterization and mapping.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

The transformative role of SBRT in the management of spinal metastases.

Nature reviews. Clinical oncology·2026
Same author

Volumetric Postcontrast T1 Turbo Spin-Echo versus Gradient-Recalled Echo MR sequences for Detecting Brain Metastases: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2026
Same author

Evaluation of Organs-at-Risk Sparing for Glioblastoma Patients Using a Small-Margin Weekly Adaptive Protocol on a 1.5T MR-Linac.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 25, 2025

Establishing an Octopus Ecosystem for Biomedical and Bioengineering Research
09:10

Establishing an Octopus Ecosystem for Biomedical and Bioengineering Research

Published on: September 22, 2021

3.0K

Proposal for 'segmented peer review' of multidisciplinary papers.

Deepak Dinakaran1, Matthew Anaka1, John R Mackey1

  • 1Departments of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute and The Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Translational Oncology
|December 17, 2020
PubMed
Summary

A new segmented peer review process streamlines evaluating complex, multidisciplinary research papers. This method enhances efficiency and reduces publication barriers for authors, reviewers, and editors.

Keywords:
MultidisciplinaryPeer-reviewTranslational research

More Related Videos

A Comprehensive Protocol for Manual Segmentation of the Medial Temporal Lobe Structures
12:30

A Comprehensive Protocol for Manual Segmentation of the Medial Temporal Lobe Structures

Published on: July 2, 2014

20.7K
Combining Multiple Data Acquisition Systems to Study Corticospinal Output and Multi-segment Biomechanics
08:48

Combining Multiple Data Acquisition Systems to Study Corticospinal Output and Multi-segment Biomechanics

Published on: January 9, 2016

7.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 25, 2025

Establishing an Octopus Ecosystem for Biomedical and Bioengineering Research
09:10

Establishing an Octopus Ecosystem for Biomedical and Bioengineering Research

Published on: September 22, 2021

3.0K
A Comprehensive Protocol for Manual Segmentation of the Medial Temporal Lobe Structures
12:30

A Comprehensive Protocol for Manual Segmentation of the Medial Temporal Lobe Structures

Published on: July 2, 2014

20.7K
Combining Multiple Data Acquisition Systems to Study Corticospinal Output and Multi-segment Biomechanics
08:48

Combining Multiple Data Acquisition Systems to Study Corticospinal Output and Multi-segment Biomechanics

Published on: January 9, 2016

7.1K

Area of Science:

  • Scientific publishing
  • Multidisciplinary research
  • Peer review

Background:

  • Current peer review systems struggle with complex, multidisciplinary studies.
  • Translational research increasingly involves papers spanning multiple specialties.
  • This creates logistic and practical barriers to effective manuscript evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel peer review process, 'segmented peer review', for multidisciplinary journal submissions.
  • To address the challenges posed by the increasing complexity of scientific research.
  • To improve the efficiency and effectiveness of evaluating research spanning multiple fields.

Main Methods:

  • Authors identify required expertise, direct reviewers to specific manuscript sections, and suggest relevant experts.
  • Reviewers receive tailored requests focusing on 'in-scope' aspects of their expertise.
  • Reviewers assess the suitability of their assigned manuscript segment for publication or revision.

Main Results:

  • The process involves segmenting the paper based on expertise and issuing targeted review requests.
  • Editors integrate individual segment reviews to form a cohesive evaluation.
  • This method aims to reduce barriers inherent in evaluating multidisciplinary research.

Conclusions:

  • Segmented peer review is a fit-for-purpose process for evaluating complex scientific work.
  • The proposed method offers tangible advantages for authors, reviewers, and journal editors.
  • It is expected to significantly reduce barriers to publication for multidisciplinary research efforts.