Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 25, 2025

A New Approach for the Comparative Analysis of Multiprotein Complexes Based on 15N Metabolic Labeling and Quantitative Mass Spectrometry
Published on: March 13, 2014
A combined microphysiological-computational omics approach in dietary protein evaluation.
Paulus G M Jochems1, Willem R Keusters2, Antoine H P America3
1Division of Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Evaluating alternative proteins for food security requires understanding their digesta peptide composition and biological effects. This study found that protein source does not determine bioactive peptide delivery or efficacy, offering a novel perspective on nutritional value.
Area of Science:
- Nutritional Science
- Biotechnology
- Food Science
Background:
- Growing global population necessitates exploring alternative protein sources for food security.
- Nutritional evaluation requires comparing digesta peptide composition and biological effects of various proteins.
- Cow's whey protein concentrate (WPC) serves as a benchmark for protein evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare seventeen protein sources against WPC using a combined experimental and computational approach.
- To assess the impact of protein digests on intestinal barrier integrity, viability, enzyme activity, and immune parameters.
- To determine if protein source dictates bioactive peptide delivery and biological efficacy.
Main Methods:
- In vitro protein digestion followed by proteomics analysis and statistical clustering.
- Utilized a bioengineered intestine (microphysiological gut system) to evaluate functional protein effects.
- Integrated digesta peptide composition with biological efficacy data for holistic analysis.
Main Results:
- Digesta peptide composition analysis yielded 3 clusters, primarily based on WPC overlap.
- Biological efficacy assessment in a gut model resulted in 6 clusters, driven by viability, enzyme activity, and immune responses.
- Combined proteomic and biological data produced 5 clusters, influenced by both peptide profiles and functional effects.
Conclusions:
- Protein source (animal, plant, or alternative) is not the primary determinant of bioactive peptide delivery.
- Biological efficacy is influenced by a combination of peptide composition and functional effects.
- This holistic approach provides a new framework for evaluating protein sources for nutritional value and food security applications.
Related Concept Videos
Proteomics
Proteomics is the study of proteomes' function. It involves the large-scale systematic study of the proteome to denote the protein complement expressed by a genome. Scientist Mark Wilkins coined the term...
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Assumption with Protein Binding
Proteins: Dietary Sources and Requirements
Protein Networks
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...

