Comparative efficacy and tolerability of third-line treatments for advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review with
Sejung Park1, Chung Mo Nam2, Seul-Gi Kim3
1Department of Biostatistics and Computing, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Songdang Institute for Cancer Research, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Background:
The most effective agent for the third-line treatment of advanced/metastatic gastric cancer (AGC) has not yet been determined. The aim of this network meta-analysis is to compare the relative efficacy and tolerability of third-line treatments for AGC.
Materials And Methods:
We conducted a comprehensive literature review of randomised clinical trials (RCTs) using four electronic databases. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs) were used as efficacy or tolerability outcomes. A Bayesian network meta-analysis with a random-effects model was used.
Results:
Seven RCTs involving 2601 patients and nine treatments were included. The results suggested that 1 mg/kg nivolumab (nivolumab1) + 3 mg/kg ipilimumab (ipilimumab3) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.59, 95% credible interval [Crl] 0.38-0.91) was the most effective treatment, followed by nivolumab (HR 0.63, 95% Crl 0.50-0.79), for prolonging OS. Regorafenib (HR 0.40, 95% Crl 0.28-0.58) was most likely to improve PFS, followed by apatinib (HR 0.45, 95% Crl 0.33-0.60). Nivolumab1 + ipilimumab3 and nivolumab were better at improving ORR, whereas nivolumab1 + ipilimumab3 had the highest toxicity based on the AEs. For benefit-risk ratio, nivolumab, apatinib or regorafenib appeared to be the best options. Chemotherapy or two different dose combinations of nivolumab and ipilimumab were ranked as the next options because of poor tolerability, despite good efficacy.
Conclusion:
Immunotherapy (nivolumab) or antiangiogenic agents (regorafenib and apatinib) are associated with benefits for benefit-risk ratio as third-line monotherapy. This study might serve as a guideline to aid in the selection of third-line treatments for AGC.
Insights
Immunotherapy (nivolumab) and antiangiogenic agents (regorafenib, apatinib) show promise as third-line treatments for advanced gastric cancer. These agents offer a favorable benefit-risk ratio compared to chemotherapy for improving patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Clinical Pharmacology
- Evidence-Based Medicine
Background:
- The optimal third-line treatment for advanced/metastatic gastric cancer (AGC) remains undefined.
- Identifying effective and tolerable therapeutic options is crucial for improving patient survival and quality of life.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a network meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and tolerability of various third-line treatments for AGC.
- To provide evidence-based guidance for selecting the most appropriate treatment strategies.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive literature review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) across four electronic databases.
- Bayesian network meta-analysis using a random-effects model to assess overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs).
Main Results:
- Nine treatments from seven RCTs involving 2601 patients were analyzed.
- Nivolumab plus ipilimumab demonstrated the greatest OS benefit, while regorafenib and apatinib showed superior PFS.
- Nivolumab and combination nivolumab/ipilimumab improved ORR, but the combination had higher toxicity; nivolumab, apatinib, and regorafenib offered the best benefit-risk ratio.
Conclusions:
- Third-line immunotherapy (nivolumab) or antiangiogenic agents (regorafenib, apatinib) as monotherapy provide significant benefit-risk advantages.
- These findings can guide clinical decision-making for third-line treatment selection in advanced gastric cancer.
More Related Videos
07:13Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
04:04Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Intratumoral Injection of Cisplatin for the Treatment of Isolated Mediastinal Recurrence of Lung Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
