Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

Following Cell-fate in E. coli After Infection by Phage Lambda
Published on: October 14, 2011
State of prophage Mu DNA upon induction
Abstract:
We have compared the process of prophage lambda induction with that of prophage Mu. According to the Campbell model, rescue of lambda DNA from the host DNA involves reversal of lambda integration such that the prophage DNA is excised from the host chromosome. We have monitored this event by locating the prophage DNA with a technique in which DNA of the lysogenic cells is cleaved with a restriction endonuclease and fractionated in agarose gels. The DNA fragments are denatured in gels, transferred to a nitrocellulose paper, and hybridized with 32P-labeled mature phage DNA. The fragments containing prophage DNA become visible after autoradiography. Upon prophage lambda induction, the phage-host junction fragments disappear and the fragment containing the lambda att site appears. No such excision is seen in prophage Mu. The Mu-host junction fragments remain intact well into the lytic cycle, when Mu DNA has undergone many rounds of replication and apparently many copies of Mu DNA have been integrated into the host DNA. Therefore, we postulate that Mu DNA replicates in situ and the replication generates a form of Mu DNA active in the integrative recombination between Mu DNA and host DNA. This type of mechanism may be common to many transposable elements.
Insights
Bacteriophage lambda (λ) DNA excision differs from bacteriophage Mu (μ) DNA replication. Unlike lambda, Mu DNA replicates in situ, generating active forms for integration into host DNA, a mechanism potentially shared by transposable elements.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Biology
- Microbiology
- Genetics
Background:
- Bacteriophage lambda (λ) integration and excision follow the Campbell model, involving specific att sites.
- Bacteriophage Mu (μ) is a temperate bacteriophage with a distinct replication and integration mechanism.
- Understanding prophage induction mechanisms is crucial for comprehending viral life cycles and genetic element dynamics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the DNA excision and replication processes of prophage lambda (λ) and prophage Mu (μ) upon induction.
- To elucidate the mechanism of prophage Mu (μ) DNA replication and integration within the host genome.
- To investigate potential similarities between Mu (μ) replication and the behavior of other transposable elements.
Main Methods:
- Utilizing restriction endonuclease digestion and agarose gel electrophoresis to analyze host-prophage DNA junctions.
- Employing Southern blotting and hybridization with radiolabeled phage DNA for sensitive detection of specific DNA fragments.
- Monitoring the disappearance of phage-host junction fragments and the appearance of att site fragments during lambda (λ) induction.
Main Results:
- Prophage lambda (λ) induction resulted in the disappearance of phage-host junction fragments and the appearance of an att site fragment, consistent with excision.
- No such excision was observed for prophage Mu (μ); Mu-host junction fragments remained intact throughout the lytic cycle.
- Mu (μ) DNA underwent extensive replication in situ, with evidence of multiple integrations into the host DNA.
Conclusions:
- Prophage Mu (μ) does not rely on excision for induction; instead, it replicates in situ.
- Mu (μ) DNA replication generates forms active in integrative recombination with the host DNA.
- The in situ replication and integration mechanism of Mu (μ) may be a conserved strategy among many transposable elements.
Related Concept Videos
Lytic Cycle of Bacteriophages
Lysogenic Cycle of Bacteriophages
Transduction
Viral Replication: Lytic Cycle
Viral Replication: Lysogenic Cycle
DNA Bacteriophages

