Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 25, 2025

Author Spotlight: Marmoset Research - Scope and Challenges
04:52

Author Spotlight: Marmoset Research - Scope and Challenges

Published on: June 9, 2023

2.3K

Pitfalls in Article Submissions for Publication.

Brijesh Nair1

  • 1Department of Dermatology, Military Hospital Jaipur, Jaipur Cantonment, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

Indian Dermatology Online Journal
|December 21, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical Trial Designs.

Indian dermatology online journal·2019
Same author

Solitary mastocytoma with positive Darier's sign.

Indian dermatology online journal·2016
Same author

Venous leg ulcer: Systemic therapy.

Indian dermatology online journal·2014
Same author

Compression therapy for venous leg ulcers.

Indian dermatology online journal·2014

This article identifies common flaws in academic publishing, from initial research concepts to journal selection. It offers a checklist to help researchers avoid frequent errors in biomedical article submissions.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Research
  • Academic Publishing
  • Dermatology

Background:

  • Publishing in reputable biomedical journals is a key goal for academicians and clinical dermatologists.
  • Many research articles suffer from critical flaws by the time they are submitted for publication.
  • These shortcomings often arise unintentionally throughout the research and writing process.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss common pitfalls encountered in academic article writing.
  • To provide guidance on avoiding errors from conceptualization to journal selection.
  • To serve as a prophylactic checklist for prospective authors.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of common fallacies in scientific writing.
  • Analysis of issues in statistical methods and authorial concepts.
Keywords:
Articlepitfallspublicationsubmissions

More Related Videos

Establishing an Octopus Ecosystem for Biomedical and Bioengineering Research
09:10

Establishing an Octopus Ecosystem for Biomedical and Bioengineering Research

Published on: September 22, 2021

3.0K
Author Spotlight: Bridging the Gap Between Field Observations and Lab Manipulations in Larval Ecology Research
05:53

Author Spotlight: Bridging the Gap Between Field Observations and Lab Manipulations in Larval Ecology Research

Published on: January 5, 2024

706

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 25, 2025

Author Spotlight: Marmoset Research - Scope and Challenges
04:52

Author Spotlight: Marmoset Research - Scope and Challenges

Published on: June 9, 2023

2.3K
Establishing an Octopus Ecosystem for Biomedical and Bioengineering Research
09:10

Establishing an Octopus Ecosystem for Biomedical and Bioengineering Research

Published on: September 22, 2021

3.0K
Author Spotlight: Bridging the Gap Between Field Observations and Lab Manipulations in Larval Ecology Research
05:53

Author Spotlight: Bridging the Gap Between Field Observations and Lab Manipulations in Larval Ecology Research

Published on: January 5, 2024

706
  • Guidance on article structuring and journal selection.

    • Main Results:

    • Identification of frequent errors in biomedical publications.
    • Highlighting flaws in conceptualization, statistical analysis, and writing.
    • Recognition of common mistakes in manuscript preparation and submission.

    Conclusions:

    • Awareness of common pitfalls can improve manuscript quality.
    • A structured approach can mitigate errors in research publication.
    • Prospective authors can benefit from a checklist of frequent fallacies.