Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 24, 2025

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
Published on: July 3, 2020
A Note on Likelihood Ratio Tests for Models with Latent Variables
Yunxiao Chen1, Irini Moustaki2, Haoran Zhang3
1Department of Statistics, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK. y.chen186@lse.ac.uk.
Abstract:
The likelihood ratio test (LRT) is widely used for comparing the relative fit of nested latent variable models. Following Wilks' theorem, the LRT is conducted by comparing the LRT statistic with its asymptotic distribution under the restricted model, a [Formula: see text] distribution with degrees of freedom equal to the difference in the number of free parameters between the two nested models under comparison. For models with latent variables such as factor analysis, structural equation models and random effects models, however, it is often found that the [Formula: see text] approximation does not hold. In this note, we show how the regularity conditions of Wilks' theorem may be violated using three examples of models with latent variables. In addition, a more general theory for LRT is given that provides the correct asymptotic theory for these LRTs. This general theory was first established in Chernoff (J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol) 45:404-413, 1954) and discussed in both van der Vaart (Asymptotic statistics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000) and Drton (Ann Stat 37:979-1012, 2009), but it does not seem to have received enough attention. We illustrate this general theory with the three examples.
Related Concept Videos
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests
Goodness-of-Fit Test
Odds Ratio
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
Types of Hypothesis Testing
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p...

