Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 24, 2025
Author Spotlight: Advancements in Multiplex Detection of Respiratory Viruses
Published on: November 10, 2023
College Campuses and COVID-19 Mitigation: Clinical and Economic Value
Elena Losina1, Valia Leifer2, Lucia Millham3
1Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, and Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts (E.L.).
Background:
Colleges in the United States are determining how to operate safely amid the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.
Objective:
To examine the clinical outcomes, cost, and cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 mitigation strategies on college campuses.
Design:
The Clinical and Economic Analysis of COVID-19 interventions (CEACOV) model, a dynamic microsimulation model, was used to examine alternative mitigation strategies. The CEACOV model tracks infections accrued by students and faculty, accounting for community transmissions.
Data Sources:
Data from published literature were used to obtain parameters related to COVID-19 and contact-hours.
Target Population:
Undergraduate students and faculty at U.S. colleges.
Time Horizon:
One semester (105 days).
Perspective:
Modified societal.
Intervention:
COVID-19 mitigation strategies, including social distancing, masks, and routine laboratory screening.
Outcome Measures:
Infections among students and faculty per 5000 students and per 1000 faculty, isolation days, tests, costs, cost per infection prevented, and cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY).
Results Of Base-Case Analysis:
Among students, mitigation strategies reduced COVID-19 cases from 3746 with no mitigation to 493 with extensive social distancing and masks, and further to 151 when laboratory testing was added among asymptomatic persons every 3 days. Among faculty, these values were 164, 28, and 25 cases, respectively. Costs ranged from about $0.4 million for minimal social distancing to about $0.9 million to $2.1 million for strategies involving laboratory testing ($10 per test), depending on testing frequency. Extensive social distancing with masks cost $170 per infection prevented ($49 200 per QALY) compared with masks alone. Adding routine laboratory testing increased cost per infection prevented to between $2010 and $17 210 (cost per QALY gained, $811 400 to $2 804 600).
Results Of Sensitivity Analysis:
Results were most sensitive to test costs.
Limitation:
Data are from multiple sources.
Conclusion:
Extensive social distancing with a mandatory mask-wearing policy can prevent most COVID-19 cases on college campuses and is very cost-effective. Routine laboratory testing would prevent 96% of infections and require low-cost tests to be economically attractive.
Primary Funding Source:
National Institutes of Health.
Related Concept Videos
01:22Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
01:21Causality in Epidemiology
01:28Antimicrobial Effectiveness
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
01:25Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
01:26Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...