Feasibility of next-generation sequencing test for patients with advanced NSCLC in clinical practice

Ryo Ariyasu1, Ken Uchibori1, Hironori Ninomiya2,3

  • 1Department of Thoracic Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.

Thoracic Cancer
|December 22, 2020
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

The Oncomine Dx next-generation sequencing (NGS) test shows lower feasibility in clinical practice for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients compared to other diagnostics. Improving biopsy procedures is key to enhancing NGS utility.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Molecular Diagnostics
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Next-generation sequencing (NGS) tests like Oncomine Dx are valuable but require high-quality samples and have long turnaround times.
  • The clinical practice feasibility of NGS for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains undetermined.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the feasibility of the Oncomine Dx test in comparison to other companion diagnostics (CDx) for advanced NSCLC patients in a real-world clinical setting.

Main Methods:

  • A cohort of advanced NSCLC patients underwent Oncomine Dx, Cobas EGFR mutation test, and ALK-IHC testing.
  • Patients were categorized into four sets: Full Analysis Set (FAS), Intent to Perform CDx (IPS), Per-Performed CDx (PPS), and Per-Completed CDx (CCS).

Main Results:

  • Oncomine Dx showed lower IPS/FAS (80.2%) and CCS/FAS (65.9%) compared to ALK-IHC and Cobas EGFR.
  • Feasibility rates for Oncomine Dx were lower with nonsurgical biopsies (78.6%-90.9%) than with surgical resections (95.0%-100%).

Conclusions:

  • The Oncomine Dx test demonstrated lower feasibility in clinical practice compared to other CDx for advanced NSCLC.
  • Improving biopsy procedures, shortening turnaround times, and obtaining larger samples are crucial for enhancing NGS feasibility.