Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

461
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
461
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.9K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.9K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

6.5K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
6.5K
Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

1.8K
Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
1.8K
Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

42.2K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
42.2K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.2K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Decision-Support System for Personalized Antidepressant Treatment in Major Depressive Disorder.

JAMA·2026
Same author

Development and initial evaluation of a patient decision aid to support decision-making in care-seeking patients with subacromial pain syndrome in primary care.

Musculoskeletal science & practice·2026
Same author

Psychometric Evaluation of the Korean Version of CollaboRATE Among Multimorbid Patients with Hypertension.

Western journal of nursing research·2026
Same author

Assessing shared decision-making in clinical practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies using OPTION-12 and OPTION-5.

BMJ evidence-based medicine·2026
Same author

Fact-Checking Large Language Model Responses to a Health Care Prompt: Comparative Study.

JMIR formative research·2026
Same author

Diagnostic investigations: harmless tests or booby traps?

Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany)·2026
Same journal

Virga and the future of motivational interviewing: Issues in training counseling skills.

Patient education and counseling·2026
Same journal

Informed choices: Patients' and healthcare professionals' perspectives on high-risk prostate cancer treatment decision-making.

Patient education and counseling·2026
Same journal

Factors influencing patients switching back to physical channels for health consultations.

Patient education and counseling·2026
Same journal

Challenges in advising people with severe mental illness to quit smoking: A conversation analysis of patient resistance.

Patient education and counseling·2026
Same journal

Alleviating the burden: The impact of interpersonal and digital communication on depressive symptoms in cancer survivors.

Patient education and counseling·2026
Same journal

Are patient goals discussed during treatment decision-making in patients with head and neck cancer? A qualitative content analysis of consultations.

Patient education and counseling·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 24, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.1K

Shared decision making: What is the work?

Glyn Elwyn1

  • 1The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Level 5 Williamson Translational Research Building, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA.

Patient Education and Counseling
|December 23, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Shared decision making in healthcare respects patient agency and autonomy. This process involves cognitive, emotional, and relational work to support informed choices, especially for ill individuals.

Keywords:
Patient centered careShared decision making

More Related Videos

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

4.1K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 24, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.1K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

4.1K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.2K

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare ethics
  • Patient autonomy
  • Shared decision making

Background:

  • Human cooperation is key to species development.
  • Healthcare interactions often exhibit power asymmetries.
  • Ethical principles mandate respecting patient agency and informed deliberation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define shared decision making (SDM) in healthcare.
  • To explore the cognitive, emotional, and relational work involved in SDM.
  • To present a model for guiding SDM, aiming to restore patient autonomy.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review on the origins and components of SDM.
  • Analysis of the multifaceted work (cognitive, emotional, relational) in SDM.
  • Development of a guiding model for SDM implementation.

Main Results:

  • Shared decision making is ethically imperative, especially with alternative treatment options.
  • SDM requires significant cognitive, emotional, and relational effort from all parties.
  • The goal of SDM, particularly for ill patients, is the restoration of autonomy.

Conclusions:

  • Shared decision making is a complex process vital for ethical healthcare.
  • Effective SDM requires addressing cognitive, emotional, and relational dynamics.
  • A structured model can facilitate SDM and enhance patient autonomy.