Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 24, 2025

07:31
Characterization of Recombination Effects in a Liquid Ionization Chamber Used for the Dosimetry of a Radiosurgical Accelerator
Published on: May 9, 2014
12.1K
Benchmarking failure mode and effects analysis of electronic brachytherapy with data from incident learning systems
Jeremy D P Hoisak1, Ryan Manger1, Irena Dragojević1
1Department of Radiation Medicine & Applied Sciences, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
Brachytherapy
|December 23, 2020
Summary
Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) effectively predicts electronic brachytherapy (eBT) failures. Incident learning systems (ILS) data can enhance FMEA accuracy by refining risk assessments for improved quality control.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Oncology
- Risk Management
Background:
- Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is a critical prospective risk assessment tool.
- It is used to identify potential equipment and process failures, informing quality control system design.
- Electronic brachytherapy (eBT) is an advanced radiation therapy technique requiring robust safety protocols.
Purpose of the Study:
- To benchmark the predictive performance of FMEAs for electronic brachytherapy (eBT) of the skin and breast.
- To compare predicted failure modes from FMEAs with actual failure modes reported in incident learning systems (ILS).
Main Methods:
- Two public and one internal ILS were queried for Xoft Axxent eBT-related events over a 9-year period.
- FMEA failure modes and Risk Priority Numbers (RPNs) from prior analyses of skin eBT and breast intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) were utilized.
- Each reported event's treatment site and primary failure mode were compared against the corresponding FMEA data.
Main Results:
- A total of 49 Xoft eBT events were identified: 31 (63.3%) for breast IORT and 18 (36.7%) for skin.
- The primary failure mode for 87.7% of all events ranked within the top 10 by RPN in the FMEA.
- For skin and IORT events specifically, failure modes ranked in the top 10 by RPN or severity in 83.3% and 90.3% of cases, respectively.
Conclusions:
- FMEA is effective in predicting failure modes for eBT, though its accuracy can be influenced by user experience.
- Incident learning systems (ILS) data are valuable for enhancing FMEA by identifying potential failure modes.
- ILS data can also inform more realistic estimations of occurrence, detectability, and severity values within FMEA.

