Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity01:25

Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity

1.7K
Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity refer to the ability of drugs to cause genetic defects and induce cancer, respectively. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies agents into four groups based on their carcinogenic potential. Group 1 agents are known human carcinogens; group 2A agents are probably carcinogenic to humans; group 3 agents lack data to support their role in carcinogenesis; and group 4 includes agents for which data support that they are not likely to be...
1.7K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

154
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
154

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

DP5 without DFT: uncertainty-calibrated graph neural net accelerates structure confirmation <i>via</i> NMR.

Chemical science·2026
Same author

Oligomerisation and stereoselective polymerisation of alkenes and alkynes using pyridyl-based Al(iii) catalysts.

Chemical science·2026
Same author

Uncertainty-aware machine learning to predict non-cancer human toxicity for the global chemicals market.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Towards automatically verifying chemical structures: the powerful combination of <sup>1</sup>H NMR and IR spectroscopy.

Chemical science·2025
Same author

Introduction to Computational Organic Chemistry.

Organic & biomolecular chemistry·2024
Same author

Leveraging Language Model Multitasking To Predict C-H Borylation Selectivity.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 24, 2025

A High-throughput Assay for the Prediction of Chemical Toxicity by Automated Phenotypic Profiling of Caenorhabditis elegans
09:01

A High-throughput Assay for the Prediction of Chemical Toxicity by Automated Phenotypic Profiling of Caenorhabditis elegans

Published on: March 14, 2019

7.5K

Machine Learning in Predictive Toxicology: Recent Applications and Future Directions for Classification Models.

Marcus W H Wang1, Jonathan M Goodman1, Timothy E H Allen1,2

  • 1Centre for Molecular Informatics, Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, United Kingdom.

Chemical Research in Toxicology
|December 28, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Machine learning is revolutionizing predictive toxicology by moving from animal studies to computational methods. This review covers machine learning applications, dominant models like SVMs, RF, and DTs, and future challenges in the field.

More Related Videos

Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation
16:02

Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation

Published on: February 10, 2023

3.0K
Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 24, 2025

A High-throughput Assay for the Prediction of Chemical Toxicity by Automated Phenotypic Profiling of Caenorhabditis elegans
09:01

A High-throughput Assay for the Prediction of Chemical Toxicity by Automated Phenotypic Profiling of Caenorhabditis elegans

Published on: March 14, 2019

7.5K
Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation
16:02

Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation

Published on: February 10, 2023

3.0K
Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.5K

Area of Science:

  • Computational toxicology
  • cheminformatics
  • toxicology

Background:

  • Predictive toxicology is increasingly relying on computational methods over traditional in vivo studies.
  • In vitro and in silico approaches, including quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling and absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) calculations, are now widely used.
  • Machine learning (ML) offers powerful tools for advancing predictive toxicology.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide an overview of machine learning applications in predictive toxicology.
  • To summarize recent successes and compare various ML models used in the field.
  • To identify current challenges and potential future improvements in ML for toxicology.

Main Methods:

  • Review of machine learning algorithms applied to predictive toxicology.
  • Inclusion of methods such as Support Vector Machines (SVMs), Random Forest (RF), Decision Trees (DTs), neural networks, regression models, Naïve Bayes, k-nearest neighbors, and ensemble learning.
  • Comparative analysis of dominant ML models in the context of available toxicological data.

Main Results:

  • Machine learning methods, particularly SVMs, RF, and DTs, have shown significant success in predictive toxicology.
  • These models are favored due to the specific characteristics of toxicological datasets.
  • A comparison of various ML models highlights their strengths and weaknesses in predicting toxicological endpoints.

Conclusions:

  • Machine learning is a transformative technology in predictive toxicology, enabling more efficient and ethical assessments.
  • SVMs, RF, and DTs are currently the leading ML approaches in this domain.
  • Addressing current challenges and exploring new avenues for improvement will further enhance the utility of ML in toxicology.