Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 24, 2025

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Coronary Artery Revascularization
Published on: September 15, 2023
Long-Term Outcomes After PCI or CABG for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease According to Lesion Location
Junho Hyun1, Ju Hyeon Kim1, Yeongjin Jeong1
1Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Insights
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is superior to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for distal left main coronary artery bifurcation disease beyond five years. Outcomes were similar for ostial or shaft disease regardless of treatment.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Limited long-term comparative data exist for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease, specifically concerning lesion site.
- Understanding lesion site impact is crucial for optimizing revascularization strategies in LMCA disease.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the influence of LMCA lesion location (ostial/shaft vs. distal bifurcation) on long-term outcomes following PCI or CABG.
- To compare the efficacy and safety of PCI versus CABG based on LMCA lesion site.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of patients from the MAIN-COMPARE registry comparing adverse outcomes between PCI and CABG.
- Outcomes assessed included all-cause mortality and target vessel revascularization over a median follow-up of 12.0 years.
- Stratification of analysis based on LMCA lesion location: ostial/shaft versus distal bifurcation.
Main Results:
- For distal LMCA bifurcation disease, PCI demonstrated higher adjusted risks for death and a serious composite outcome compared to CABG, particularly after 5 years.
- Drug-eluting stents (DES) showed progressively diverging risks for death and composite outcomes compared to CABG for distal bifurcation disease beyond 5 years.
- No significant differences in outcomes were observed between PCI and CABG for ostial or shaft LMCA disease.
Conclusions:
- CABG is associated with lower long-term mortality and serious composite outcome rates compared to DES for distal LMCA bifurcation disease.
- For ostial or shaft LMCA disease, PCI and CABG demonstrate similar long-term safety and efficacy.
- The findings highlight the importance of lesion site in guiding treatment decisions for LMCA disease.
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of lesion site (ostial or shaft vs. distal bifurcation) on long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease.
Background:
Long-term comparative data after PCI and CABG for LMCA disease according to lesion site are limited.
Methods:
Patients from the MAIN-COMPARE (Revascularization for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty Versus Surgical Revascularization) registry were analyzed, comparing adverse outcomes (all-cause mortality [a composite outcome of death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, or stroke] and target vessel revascularization) between PCI and CABG according to LMCA lesion location during a median follow-up period of 12.0 years.
Results:
In overall population, the adjusted risks for death and serious composite outcome were higher after PCI than after CABG for distal bifurcation disease, which was mainly separated beyond 5 years. These outcomes were not different for ostial or shaft disease. When comparing drug-eluting stents (DES) and CABG, the adjusted risks for death and serious composite outcome progressively diverged beyond 5 years after DES compared with CABG for distal bifurcation disease (death: hazard ratio: 1.78; 95% confidence interval: 1.22 to 2.59; composite outcome: hazard ratio: 1.94; 95% confidence interval: 1.35 to 2.79). This difference was driven mainly by PCI with a 2-stent technique for distal bifurcation. In contrast, the adjusted risks for these outcomes were similar between DES and CABG for ostial or shaft disease.
Conclusions:
Among patients with distal LMCA bifurcation disease, CABG showed lower mortality and serious composite outcome rates compared with DES beyond 5 years. However, there were no between-group differences in these outcomes among patients with ostial or shaft LMCA disease.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations

