Technical Success and Complication Rates of Retrograde Arterial Access for Endovascular Therapy for Critical Limb

Stefanos Giannopoulos1, Luis M Palena2, Ehrin J Armstrong1

  • 1Division of Cardiology, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Centre, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA.

Insights

Retrograde endovascular treatment is safe and effective for critical limb ischaemia (CLI) when antegrade approaches fail. This meta-analysis shows high technical success and low complication rates, improving limb salvage.

Area of Science:

  • Vascular Surgery
  • Endovascular Interventions
  • Critical Limb Ischaemia Management

Background:

  • Antegrade endovascular techniques for critical limb ischaemia (CLI) can be challenging, leading to technical and clinical failure.
  • Retrograde access offers an alternative approach for complex femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal lesions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and meta-analyze the literature on retrograde endovascular treatment for CLI.
  • To assess the technical success and complication rates of retrograde access in CLI patients.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central databases until May 2020.
  • A meta-analysis of 31 observational studies (1,910 patients) was performed using random effects modelling.
  • Adverse events and procedural outcomes were calculated.

Main Results:

  • The overall technical success rate for the retrograde approach was 96%.
  • Infrequent complications included perforation (2.1%), flow-limiting dissection (0.6%), distal embolisation (0.1%), and local haematoma (1.3%).
  • Six-month primary patency was 78% and limb salvage was 77%.

Conclusions:

  • Retrograde or bidirectional antegrade/retrograde approaches are safe and effective for CLI angioplasty, especially when antegrade treatment fails.
  • Further prospective studies are needed to optimize long-term limb salvage and survival outcomes.
Abstract