Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 24, 2025

Basophil Activation Test for Allergy Diagnosis
Published on: May 31, 2021
Continuous and Daily Oral Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy: Results from a 2-Year Open-Label Follow-On Study
Brian P Vickery1, Andrea Vereda2, Caroline Nilsson3
1Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga.
Insights
Daily oral immunotherapy with Peanut (Arachis Hypogaea) allergen powder-dnfp (PTAH) demonstrated sustained safety and efficacy in peanut-allergic children and adolescents beyond one year, showing ongoing immunomodulation.
Area of Science:
- Allergy and Immunology
- Clinical Trials
- Food Hypersensitivity
Background:
- The PALISADE trial established the efficacy of daily oral immunotherapy using Peanut (Arachis Hypogaea) allergen powder-dnfp (PTAH) in children and adolescents with peanut allergy.
- This established the foundation for further investigation into long-term treatment and alternative dosing strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of continued oral immunotherapy with PTAH beyond one year in peanut-allergic individuals.
- To explore alternative dosing regimens for PTAH in both previously treated and treatment-naive participants.
Main Methods:
- The ARC004 study enrolled participants from the PALISADE trial, including those continuing PTAH treatment and those new to it.
- Participants received daily or non-daily PTAH dosing, with naive participants undergoing dose escalation.
- Safety and efficacy were assessed through adverse event monitoring and exit double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges up to 2000 mg peanut protein.
Main Results:
- 358 participants (ages 4-17) entered the study, with 256 continuing PTAH and 102 being PTAH-naive.
- Adverse event rates were generally higher in non-daily dosing cohorts compared to daily, with most events being mild or moderate.
- Daily dosing cohorts showed higher desensitization rates, particularly cohort 3A with the longest daily treatment duration.
- PTAH continuation demonstrated ongoing immunomodulation, and outcomes in PTAH-naive participants mirrored the original PALISADE trial's active arm.
Conclusions:
- Continued daily oral immunotherapy with PTAH beyond one year is safe and effective for managing peanut allergy.
- The treatment supports sustained desensitization and demonstrates ongoing immunomodulatory effects during the second year of therapy.
Background:
The randomized, controlled PALISADE trial demonstrated the benefit of daily oral immunotherapy with Peanut (Arachis Hypogaea) allergen powder-dnfp (PTAH, formerly AR101) in peanut-allergic children and adolescents.
Objective:
ARC004, the open-label follow-on study to PALISADE, used 5 dosing cohorts to explore PTAH treatment beyond 1 year and alternative dosing regimens in peanut-allergic individuals.
Methods:
Active arm (PTAH-continuing) PALISADE participants who tolerated 300-mg peanut protein at the exit double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge and placebo arm (PTAH-naive) participants could enter ARC004. PTAH-continuing participants were assigned to receive daily (cohorts 1 and 3A) or non-daily (cohorts 2, 3B, and 3C) dosing regimens; PTAH-naive participants were built up to 300 mg/d PTAH, followed by maintenance dosing. At study completion, participants underwent an exit double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge with doses up to 2000 mg peanut protein. Data were assessed using descriptive statistics.
Results:
Overall, 358 (87.5%) eligible participants (4-17 years) entered ARC004 (PTAH-continuing, n = 256; PTAH-naive, n = 102). Among PTAH-continuing participants, exposure-adjusted adverse event rates were 12.94 to 17.54/participant-year and 25.95 to 42.49/participant-year in daily and non-daily dosing cohorts, respectively; most participants (83%) experienced mild or moderate adverse events. Daily dosing cohorts appeared to have higher desensitization rates than non-daily dosing cohorts. Of all PTAH-continuing cohorts, cohort 3A had the longest daily dosing duration and the highest desensitization rates. Changes in immune markers with PTAH continuation demonstrated ongoing immunomodulation. Outcomes in PTAH-naive participants mirrored those of the PALISADE active arm.
Conclusions:
Continued daily PTAH treatment beyond 1 year showed sustained safety and efficacy. Ongoing immunomodulation was observed during the second year of treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Antiasthma Drugs: Mast Cell Stabilizers and Anti-IgE Drugs
Mast cell stabilizers, such as cromolyn (also known as sodium cromoglycate) and nedocromil (Tilade), are effective drugs in asthma management. These stabilizers hinder histamine release by skillfully obstructing the activation of mast cells and other cellular entities. Notably, they navigate this task without...
Allergic Drug Reactions
Allergic Reactions
Chronic Pancreatitis II: Collaborative Care
Assessment:
Asthma-IV: Diagnostic and Management
Clinical Assessment for Asthma:
This is the first step in diagnosing and managing asthma. It includes:
Asthma-III: Symptoms and Complications
Classification of Asthma

