In vitro and in silico testing of partially and fully bioresorbable vascular scaffold

Nenad Filipovic1, Dalibor Nikolic1, Velibor Isailovic1

  • 1Bioengineering Research and Development Center, BioIRC, Kragujevac, Serbia; Faculty of Engineering, University of Kragujevac, Serbia.

Journal of Biomechanics
|December 28, 2020
PubMed

Insights

In vitro and in silico testing of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) showed strong correlations. This study suggests in silico methods can replace some mechanical testing for coronary stent regulatory submissions.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Materials Science
  • Medical Devices

Background:

  • Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading global cause of death, often treated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA).
  • PTCA involves balloon angioplasty and coronary stent deployment to open blocked arteries and restore blood flow.
  • Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) are advanced devices used in CAD treatment, requiring rigorous mechanical testing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the in vitro and in silico mechanical performance of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS).
  • To compare the accuracy of in silico simulations against standard in vitro mechanical testing methods for coronary stents.
  • To assess the potential of in silico testing to streamline regulatory submissions for BVS.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a material model for poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) for use in in-house simulation software.
  • Conducting in vitro mechanical tests (inflation, radial compression, crush resistance) on BVS.
  • Performing in silico simulations of the same mechanical tests and comparing results with experimental data.

Main Results:

  • A strong correlation (R² > 0.99, R > 0.99) was observed between in silico simulation results and in vitro experimental data.
  • The study demonstrated that in silico tests can effectively mimic established ISO standards for mechanical in vitro stent testing.
  • Graphs comparing displacement-force, diameter-load, and diameter-pressure curves showed high agreement between simulated and real-world outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • In silico testing provides a reliable method for evaluating the mechanical properties of coronary stents and BVS.
  • Computational modeling can significantly reduce the need for extensive physical mechanical testing in BVS development.
  • This approach offers a pathway to partially or fully replace mechanical testing for regulatory submissions, accelerating device approval.

Related Concept Videos