Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

14.6K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.6K
Competition02:34

Competition

23.6K
When organisms require the same limited resources within an environment, they may have to compete for them. Competition is a net-negative interaction. Even if two competing individuals or populations do not interact directly, the overall fitness of both competitors is lowered as a result of not having full access to the limited resource.
23.6K
Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

42.2K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
42.2K
Conformity01:20

Conformity

47.1K
Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
47.1K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

30.8K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
30.8K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

2.5K
2.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The private solution trap in collective action problems across 34 nations.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Do exhausted primary school students cheat more? A randomized field experiment.

PloS one·2021
Same author

Time preferences and their life outcome correlates: Evidence from a representative survey.

PloS one·2020
Same author

Which preferences associate with school performance?-Lessons from an exploratory study with university students.

PloS one·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 24, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.7K

Conditional cooperation in group contests.

Hubert János Kiss1,2, Alfonso Rosa-Garcia3, Vita Zhukova4

  • 1Center for Economic and Regional Studies, Institute of Economics (KRTK KTI), Budapest, Hungary.

Plos One
|December 28, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Conditional cooperation, where individuals reciprocate contributions, extends to group contests. It thrives in successful groups but disappears when group performance leads to losing.

More Related Videos

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.4K
Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

15.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 24, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.7K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.4K
Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

15.4K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Economics
  • Game Theory
  • Social Psychology

Background:

  • Conditional cooperation is a known phenomenon in the private provision of public goods.
  • Group contests involve competition between groups where individual contributions impact collective success.
  • Understanding cooperation dynamics in competitive environments is crucial for group performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To experimentally investigate the presence and determinants of conditional cooperation in group contests.
  • To identify factors influencing conditional cooperation beyond the private provision of public goods.

Main Methods:

  • Experimental design simulating group contests.
  • Observation of participant contributions and group outcomes.
  • Econometric analysis using random-effect linear panel regression with controls.

Main Results:

  • Conditional cooperation was observed in successful groups and groups outperforming rivals.
  • Conditional cooperation vanished in groups that lost due to poor collective performance.
  • Group success and relative performance are key determinants of conditional cooperation.

Conclusions:

  • Conditional cooperation is a relevant behavior in group contest settings.
  • Group success and performance relative to competitors significantly influence conditional cooperation.
  • The findings extend the understanding of cooperation in competitive social dilemmas.