Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Navier–Stokes Equations01:28

Navier–Stokes Equations

1.4K
For incompressible Newtonian fluids, where density remains constant, stresses show a linear relationship with the deformation rate, defined by normal and shear stresses. Normal stresses depend on the pressure exerted on the fluid and the rate of deformation in specific directions, which determines how fluid flows under varying pressures. Shear stresses, on the other hand, act tangentially across fluid layers. They explain how adjacent fluid layers slide relative to one another, connecting...
1.4K
Euler's Equations of Motion01:28

Euler's Equations of Motion

694
In fluid mechanics, shear stresses arise from viscosity, which represents a fluid's internal resistance to deformation. For low-viscosity fluids, like water, these stresses are minimal, simplifying flow analysis by allowing the fluid to be treated as inviscid, or frictionless. In an inviscid fluid, shear stresses are absent, leaving only normal stresses, which act perpendicularly to fluid elements. Notably, pressure — defined as the negative of the normal stress — remains uniform across...
694
Bernoulli's Equation for Flow Along a Streamline01:30

Bernoulli's Equation for Flow Along a Streamline

1.3K
Bernoulli's equation relates the energy conservation in a fluid moving along a streamline. The equation applies to incompressible and inviscid fluids under steady flow. For such a flow, Newton's second law is applied to a small fluid element, which experiences forces due to pressure differences, gravity, and velocity variations. The force balance leads to the following form of Bernoulli's equation:
1.3K
Steady, Laminar Flow Between Parallel Plates01:17

Steady, Laminar Flow Between Parallel Plates

583
Understanding steady, laminar flow between parallel plates is essential for analyzing and designing flow in narrow rectangular channels, commonly found in various water conveyance and drainage systems. The Navier-Stokes equations govern fluid motion and are generally challenging to solve due to their nonlinearity. However, simplifications are possible in certain cases, like the steady laminar flow between parallel plates. For this scenario, we assume steady, incompressible, laminar flow.
583
Velocity Potential01:20

Velocity Potential

553
In steady, incompressible flow through a long, straight pipe with a uniform cross-section, the flow in the central region (far from the pipe walls) is irrotational. This irrotational nature means that fluid particles do not rotate around their axes, and a scalar function called the velocity potential, represented by ϕ, can be used to describe their movement. In irrotational flows, the velocity field V is defined as the gradient of the velocity potential:
553
Newtonian Fluid: Problem Solving01:18

Newtonian Fluid: Problem Solving

668
Newtonian fluids exhibit a constant viscosity, meaning their shear stress and shear strain rate are directly proportional. This property ensures a predictable and stable response to applied forces, maintaining a linear relationship between force and flow. Examples include water, air, and light oils, consistently demonstrating this proportional behavior regardless of external conditions.
A velocity gradient forms within the fluid when a Newtonian fluid is placed between two parallel plates, with...
668

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Stochastic modelling in fluid dynamics: Itô versus Stratonovich.

Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2020
Same author

Stochastic Geometric Models with Non-stationary Spatial Correlations in Lagrangian Fluid Flows.

Journal of nonlinear science·2018
Same author

Dynamics of non-holonomic systems with stochastic transport.

Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2018
Same author

Stochastic partial differential fluid equations as a diffusive limit of deterministic Lagrangian multi-time dynamics.

Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2017
Same author

<i>G</i>-Strands on symmetric spaces.

Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2017
Same journal

Decomposable and Essentially Univariate Mass-Action Systems: Extensions of the Deficiency One Theorem.

Journal of nonlinear science·2026
Same journal

Symplectic Structures on the Space of Space Curves.

Journal of nonlinear science·2026
Same journal

Evolution Equations on Co-evolving Graphs: Long-Time Behaviour and the Graph-Continuity Equation.

Journal of nonlinear science·2026
Same journal

Robust Heteroclinic Cycles in Pluridimensions.

Journal of nonlinear science·2025
Same journal

The Inheritance of Local Bifurcations in Mass Action Networks.

Journal of nonlinear science·2025
Same journal

Charge Transport Systems with Fermi-Dirac Statistics for Memristors.

Journal of nonlinear science·2025
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 24, 2025

Experimental Investigation of Secondary Flow Structures Downstream of a Model Type IV Stent Failure in a 180&#176; Curved Artery Test Section
11:00

Experimental Investigation of Secondary Flow Structures Downstream of a Model Type IV Stent Failure in a 180° Curved Artery Test Section

Published on: July 19, 2016

11.8K

Stochastic Variational Formulations of Fluid Wave-Current Interaction.

Darryl D Holm1

  • 1Imperial College London, London, UK.

Journal of Nonlinear Science
|December 28, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces stochasticity into wave-current interaction models, comparing the generalized Lagrangian mean (GLM) and Craik-Leibovich (CL) approaches to capture multiscale physics uncertainty. Both models reveal distinct stochastic behaviors in fluid dynamics and wave propagation.

Keywords:
GFDGeometric mechanicsWave-current interaction

More Related Videos

Measurements of Waves in a Wind-wave Tank Under Steady and Time-varying Wind Forcing
08:54

Measurements of Waves in a Wind-wave Tank Under Steady and Time-varying Wind Forcing

Published on: February 13, 2018

8.9K
An Analog Macroscopic Technique for Studying Molecular Hydrodynamic Processes in Dense Gases and Liquids
11:03

An Analog Macroscopic Technique for Studying Molecular Hydrodynamic Processes in Dense Gases and Liquids

Published on: December 4, 2017

8.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 24, 2025

Experimental Investigation of Secondary Flow Structures Downstream of a Model Type IV Stent Failure in a 180&#176; Curved Artery Test Section
11:00

Experimental Investigation of Secondary Flow Structures Downstream of a Model Type IV Stent Failure in a 180° Curved Artery Test Section

Published on: July 19, 2016

11.8K
Measurements of Waves in a Wind-wave Tank Under Steady and Time-varying Wind Forcing
08:54

Measurements of Waves in a Wind-wave Tank Under Steady and Time-varying Wind Forcing

Published on: February 13, 2018

8.9K
An Analog Macroscopic Technique for Studying Molecular Hydrodynamic Processes in Dense Gases and Liquids
11:03

An Analog Macroscopic Technique for Studying Molecular Hydrodynamic Processes in Dense Gases and Liquids

Published on: December 4, 2017

8.8K

Area of Science:

  • Fluid Dynamics
  • Wave Propagation
  • Stochastic Modeling

Background:

  • Wave-current interaction (WCI) is a complex multiscale, multi-physics phenomenon.
  • Existing models often lack comprehensive uncertainty quantification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce stochasticity into two classic WCI models: generalized Lagrangian mean (GLM) and Craik-Leibovich (CL).
  • To compare the distinct ways stochasticity manifests in the GLM and CL frameworks.
  • To analyze WCI within a generalized stochastic Hamilton's principle for 3D Euler-Boussinesq fluids.

Main Methods:

  • Incorporating stochasticity into the wave dynamics of GLM and CL models.
  • Separating Lagrangian (fluid) and Eulerian (wave) degrees of freedom using Hamilton's principle for GLM.
  • Coupling Euler-Poincaré reduced Lagrangian for currents with a phase-space Lagrangian for waves.
  • Applying GLM and CL methods to 1D and 2D shallow water flow models.
  • Comparing Kelvin circulation theorems for stochastic GLM and CL models.

Main Results:

  • GLM introduces stochasticity in Lagrangian transport velocity and wave group velocity.
  • CL allows stochasticity in both the integrand and circulation loop's Lagrangian transport velocity.
  • Differences in stochasticity arise from the definition of Eulerian velocity relative to Stokes drift.
  • The study provides a unified framework using stochastic Hamilton's principle for 3D Euler-Boussinesq fluids.

Conclusions:

  • The GLM and CL models offer distinct yet complementary approaches to modeling WCI uncertainty.
  • Stochasticity in WCI can be systematically incorporated into fluid dynamics models.
  • Understanding these stochastic differences is crucial for accurate multiscale WCI simulations.