'What's in a name?'-The effective promotion of brain health in preterm babies

Khalid Aziz1

  • 1Department of Pediatrics (Newborn Medicine), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.

Paediatrics & Child Health
|December 28, 2020
PubMed

Insights

Improving brain health in very preterm babies remains difficult due to unclear language, causation concepts, and quality improvement methods. A new approach is needed for better neonatal brain health outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatalogy
  • Neuroscience
  • Quality Improvement Science

Background:

  • Optimal brain health in very preterm infants is a significant challenge in modern neonatology.
  • Despite advances in other neonatal care areas, progress in infant brain health has been limited.
  • Existing approaches face barriers related to inconsistent terminology, causal reasoning, and rigorous application of quality improvement science.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and address the critical barriers hindering progress in achieving optimal brain health for very preterm infants.
  • To advocate for a refined approach to language, causation, and implementation science within neonatal research and clinical practice.
  • To improve the identification of quality improvement opportunities and enhance the impact of interventions aimed at neonatal brain health.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of current language, definitions, and causal representations used in neonatal research and clinical guidelines.
  • Evaluation of the rigor and application of quality improvement science in the context of neonatal brain health.
  • Identification of flaws in existing scientific communication and quality improvement frameworks.

Main Results:

  • Persistent flaws in language, definitions, and causal understanding impede progress in neonatal brain health.
  • Current clinical guidelines and research publications have not adequately addressed these linguistic and conceptual issues.
  • The lack of standardized and precise language limits the effectiveness of quality improvement initiatives.

Conclusions:

  • A comprehensive re-evaluation of language, causation, and implementation science is essential for advancing neonatal brain health.
  • The neonatal research and clinical community requires a unified and improved approach to these foundational elements.
  • Addressing these flaws is crucial for unlocking new opportunities and maximizing the impact of quality improvement efforts for very preterm infants.