Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 24, 2025

Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Measurements in Cochlear Implantation and Its Application in the Postoperative Fitting Process
Published on: June 21, 2024
Speech Segregation in Active Middle Ear Stimulation: Masking Release With Changing Fundamental Frequency
Alice Barbara Auinger1, Rudolfs Liepins1, Alexandra Kaider2
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Active middle ear implant (AMEI) users with hearing loss can benefit from fundamental frequency (F0) differences between talkers in noisy environments. This study shows AMEI users experience a masking release similar to normal-hearing individuals when F0 differences are at least 8 semitones.
Area of Science:
- Audiology
- Speech Processing
- Hearing Implant Technology
Background:
- Temporal fine structure, including fundamental frequency (F0), is crucial for speech perception in noise.
- Cochlear hearing loss impairs temporal fine structure resolution, negatively impacting speech understanding.
- While active middle ear implants (AMEIs) offer improved sound quality, users often struggle in noisy situations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if Vibrant Soundbridge AMEI users benefit from fundamental frequency (F0) differences between concurrent talkers.
- To compare the F0-based masking release in AMEI users with that of normal-hearing (NH) individuals.
Main Methods:
- 13 AMEI users and 13 NH individuals participated.
- A modified Oldenburg sentence test was used to create a concurrent talker scenario with varying F0 differences (4, 8, 12 semitones).
- Speech reception threshold was assessed adaptively, with AMEI users tested in two configurations (contralateral ear plugged and both ears plugged).
Main Results:
- Both AMEI users and NH individuals showed improved speech perception with increased F0 differences.
- A significant F0-based masking release was observed for AMEI users at F0 differences of 8 semitones (approx. 3 dB) and 12 semitones (approx. 3.5 dB).
- The masking release in AMEI users was comparable to, though slightly less than, that observed in NH listeners (approx. 5 dB).
Conclusions:
- AMEI users can achieve a masking release based on F0 differences in concurrent talker situations, particularly with an 8-semitone difference or greater.
- Occluding the ear canal did not significantly impact speech perception performance in AMEI users.
- These findings highlight the benefit of F0 processing for AMEI users, contributing to understanding low-frequency acoustic hearing.
More Related Videos
11:39Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique
Published on: September 7, 2022
04:32Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention
Published on: December 20, 2024