Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interval estimates for correlation coefficients corrected for within-person variation: implications for study design

B Rosner1, W C Willett

  • 1Channing Laboratory, Department of Preventive Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

American Journal of Epidemiology
|February 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Simultaneous mapping of the ultrafast time and fluence dependence of the laser-induced insulator-to-metal transition in magnetite.

Structural dynamics (Melville, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Maternal rotating night shift work before pregnancy and offspring stress markers.

Physiology & behavior·2019
Same author

Rotating night shift work and menopausal age.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2019
Same author

Towards X-ray transient grating spectroscopy.

Optics letters·2019
Same author

Different menopausal hormone regimens and risk of breast cancer.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2018
Same author

Consumption of soy foods and isoflavones and risk of type 2 diabetes: a pooled analysis of three US cohorts.

European journal of clinical nutrition·2016

Random measurement error can weaken correlation coefficients. This study provides a corrected correlation coefficient standard error, offering insights into optimal study designs for minimizing error and maximizing statistical power.

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • Random measurement error attenuates correlation coefficients.
  • Averaging replicates or using corrected coefficients can mitigate this attenuation.
  • Estimating the standard error of corrected coefficients is crucial for accurate statistical inference.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To derive and present the standard error for a corrected correlation coefficient.
  • To develop a confidence interval for the corrected correlation coefficient.
  • To evaluate the efficiency of different study designs in the presence of measurement error.

Main Methods:

  • The standard error calculation incorporates variability of observed correlations and intraclass correlation coefficients.
  • Confidence intervals are derived based on the estimated standard error.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Study designs are compared based on minimizing the standard error of the corrected coefficient for a fixed total number of measurements.

    • Main Results:

    • The standard error accounts for measurement error variability.
    • The derived standard error is applicable for hypothesis testing and comparing correlations across studies with varying error levels.
    • Optimal study design generally involves a maximum of five replicates per individual to minimize standard error.

    Conclusions:

    • The corrected correlation coefficient standard error provides a valuable tool for statistical analysis in the presence of measurement error.
    • The findings offer guidance on optimizing study designs, particularly regarding the number of replicates per individual.
    • For high intraclass correlations (≥0.5), limiting replicates to two per individual is often optimal.