The benefits of defibrillator in heart failure patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy: A meta-analysis
Yu-Xiang Long1, Yue Hu1, Di-Yu Cui1
1Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Insights
Adding an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) significantly reduces all-cause mortality in most patients. However, this survival benefit was not observed in elderly patients or those with nonischemic cardiomyopathy.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Current guidelines lack recommendations for additional implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) patients.
- The use of ICDs with CRT remains controversial due to limited randomized controlled trial evidence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically evaluate the impact of adding an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on all-cause mortality.
- To compare outcomes between cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) and cardiac resynchronization therapy with a pacemaker (CRT-P).
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL up to May 2020.
- Meta-analysis of 21 studies involving 69,919 patients was performed using a random-effect model.
- Adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) for all-cause mortality were pooled and analyzed, including subgroup analyses.
Main Results:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) significantly reduced all-cause mortality compared to cardiac resynchronization therapy with a pacemaker (CRT-P) (aHR: 0.80).
- A significant mortality benefit was observed in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (aHR: 0.74) and for primary prevention (aHR: 0.87).
- No significant difference in mortality was found for patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (aHR: 0.91) or those aged 75 years or older (aHR: 0.96).
Conclusions:
- Additional implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy is associated with reduced all-cause mortality in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
- The survival benefit of adding an ICD to CRT may not extend to elderly patients (≥75 years) or those with nonischemic cardiomyopathy.
- Further research may be needed to refine indications for ICD implantation in specific patient subgroups undergoing CRT.
Background:
Current guidelines did not provide recommendations on indications of an additional implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) to patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), and it still remains controversial due to lack of evidence from randomized controlled trials.
Method:
PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL from the inception to May 2020 were systematically screened for studies reporting on the comparison of cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) and cardiac resynchronization therapy with pacemaker (CRT-P), focusing on the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of all-cause mortality. We pooled the effects using a random-effect model.
Results:
Twenty-one studies encompassing 69,919 patients were included in this meta-analysis. With no restriction to characteristics of including population, CRT-D was associated with a lower all-cause mortality compared with CRT-P significantly (aHR: 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74-0.87, I2 = 36.8%, p < .001). This mortality benefit was also observed in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (aHR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.64-0.86, I2 = 0%, p < .001). However, there is no significant difference in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) (aHR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.82-1.01, I2 = 0%, p = .087), older age (age ≥75 years, aHR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.83-1.12, I2 = 0%, p = .610). Subgroup analysis was performed and indicated the survival benefit of CRT-D for primary prevention compared with CRT-P (aHR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.79-0.95, I2 = 0%, p = .003).
Conclusion:
After adjusted the differences in clinical characteristics, additional ICD therapy was associated with a reduced all-cause mortality in patients receiving CRT. However, our work suggested that additional ICD may not be applied to elderly (≥75 years) or patients with NICM.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias


