Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Language and Cognition01:27

Language and Cognition

566
Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
566
Lateralization01:28

Lateralization

767
Brain lateralization refers to the division of mental processes and functions between the two hemispheres of the brain, a phenomenon that optimizes neural efficiency and underpins complex abilities in humans. This specialization allows each hemisphere to perform tasks where it has a comparative advantage, facilitating more refined cognitive capabilities across different domains.
767
Emotional Expression01:26

Emotional Expression

678
Emotional expression encompasses how individuals convey their emotions through verbal communication and non-verbal cues. These non-verbal actions include facial expressions, body language, and physical gestures, such as frowning or smiling. Among these, facial expressions play a crucial role in emotional expression and are understood universally, indicating a biological basis for how humans communicate emotions.
Universal Facial Expressions
Psychologist Paul Ekman identified seven basic...
678
Measures of Intelligence01:29

Measures of Intelligence

8.0K
Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
8.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impact of Short-Term Hearing Aid Use on Cognitive Performance, Noise Acceptance, and Self-Perceived Benefit.

American journal of audiology·2025
Same author

Impact of an Auditory Processing Training Program on Individuals With Autism Spectrum Disorder.

American journal of audiology·2024
Same author

Grammatical gender in spoken word recognition in school-age Spanish monolingual and Spanish-English bilingual children.

Frontiers in psychology·2024
Same author

The Effect of Language Dominance on Classic Semantic, Action, Emotional, and Phonemic Fluency in Unbalanced Bilinguals.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2023
Same author

Neural Mechanisms of the Acceptable Noise Level.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2023
Same author

Factors Predicting Mental Effort Associated With Verbal Fluency: Cue Types, Switching, and Fear of Negative Evaluation.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 23, 2025

Correlating Behavioral Responses to fMRI Signals from Human Prefrontal Cortex: Examining Cognitive Processes Using Task Analysis
10:33

Correlating Behavioral Responses to fMRI Signals from Human Prefrontal Cortex: Examining Cognitive Processes Using Task Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2012

13.1K

Performance Differences Between Native and Non-Native Speakers on a New Happy-Sad Executive Function Measure.

Boji P W Lam1, Zenzi M Griffin2, Thomas P Marquardt3

  • 1Department of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology, The University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76203, USA.

Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology : the Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists
|December 29, 2020
PubMed
Summary

The happy-sad task, a new executive function measure, showed native English speakers performed slower on incongruent trials compared to non-native speakers. Language of administration impacts inhibitory control assessment.

Keywords:
AssessmentEmotionExecutive functionNon-native language context

More Related Videos

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning
05:33

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning

Published on: January 29, 2020

6.2K
Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome
08:31

Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome

Published on: July 31, 2016

14.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 23, 2025

Correlating Behavioral Responses to fMRI Signals from Human Prefrontal Cortex: Examining Cognitive Processes Using Task Analysis
10:33

Correlating Behavioral Responses to fMRI Signals from Human Prefrontal Cortex: Examining Cognitive Processes Using Task Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2012

13.1K
Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning
05:33

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning

Published on: January 29, 2020

6.2K
Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome
08:31

Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome

Published on: July 31, 2016

14.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Linguistics

Background:

  • The happy-sad task, an adaptation of the day-night task, assesses inhibitory control using emotional concepts.
  • This task shows higher inhibitory demands for native speakers but its performance based on language of administration is unexamined.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of language of test administration on performance in the happy-sad task.
  • To compare inhibitory control between native and non-native English speakers using the happy-sad task.

Main Methods:

  • Seventy native and 50 non-native English speakers completed computerized day-night and happy-sad tasks in English.
  • Participants categorized stimuli congruently or incongruently; English proficiency was assessed via lexical decision tasks.

Main Results:

  • Native speakers were slower in the incongruent condition of the happy-sad task, indicating a greater congruency effect.
  • Lexical decision performance correlated with performance on challenging incongruent conditions, suggesting language proficiency influences inhibitory control.

Conclusions:

  • The happy-sad task is a valuable measure for evaluating inhibitory control in native English speakers.
  • Language of administration is a critical factor influencing performance differences between native and non-native speakers in executive function assessments.