Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 23, 2025

Impedance-based Real-time Measurement of Cancer Cell Migration and Invasion
Published on: April 2, 2020
Emerging roles of DYRK2 in cancer
Vasudha Tandon1, Laureano de la Vega1, Sourav Banerjee1
1Division of Cellular Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Abstract:
Over the last decade, the CMGC kinase DYRK2 has been reported as a tumor suppressor across various cancers triggering major antitumor and proapoptotic signals in breast, colon, liver, ovary, brain, and lung cancers, with lower DYRK2 expression correlated with poorer prognosis in patients. Contrary to this, various medicinal chemistry studies reported robust antiproliferative properties of DYRK2 inhibitors, whereas unbiased 'omics' and genome-wide association study-based studies identified DYRK2 as a highly overexpressed kinase in various patient tumor samples. A major paradigm shift occurred in the last 4 years when DYRK2 was found to regulate proteostasis in cancer via a two-pronged mechanism. DYRK2 phosphorylated and activated the 26S proteasome to enhance degradation of misfolded/tumor-suppressor proteins while also promoting the nuclear stability and transcriptional activity of its substrate, heat-shock factor 1 triggering protein folding. Together, DYRK2 regulates proteostasis and promotes protumorigenic survival for specific cancers. Indeed, potent and selective small-molecule inhibitors of DYRK2 exhibit in vitro and in vivo anti-tumor activity in triple-negative breast cancer and myeloma models. However, with conflicting and contradictory reports across different cancers, the overarching role of DYRK2 remains enigmatic. Specific cancer (sub)types coupled to spatiotemporal interactions with substrates could decide the procancer or anticancer role of DYRK2. The current review aims to provide a balanced and critical appreciation of the literature to date, highlighting top substrates such as p53, c-Myc, c-Jun, heat-shock factor 1, proteasome, or NOTCH1, to discuss DYRK2 inhibitors available to the scientific community and to shed light on this duality of protumorigenic and antitumorigenic roles of DYRK2.
Insights
The dual role of dual-specificity tyrosine-phosphorylation-regulated kinase 2 (DYRK2) in cancer remains complex. While previously considered a tumor suppressor, recent findings reveal DYRK2 promotes cancer progression by regulating proteostasis, highlighting its potential as a therapeutic target.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
- Biochemistry
Background:
- Dual-specificity tyrosine-phosphorylation-regulated kinase 2 (DYRK2) has conflicting reports regarding its role in cancer, initially identified as a tumor suppressor but later found to be overexpressed in tumors.
- Recent research indicates DYRK2 regulates proteostasis through a two-pronged mechanism involving the 26S proteasome and heat-shock factor 1, suggesting a protumorigenic role in certain cancers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically review the literature on DYRK2's dual role in cancer.
- To highlight key DYRK2 substrates and discuss available small-molecule inhibitors.
- To elucidate the context-dependent protumorigenic and antitumorigenic functions of DYRK2.
Main Methods:
- Literature review and critical analysis of published studies on DYRK2 in various cancer types.
- Focus on 'omics' data, genome-wide association studies, and medicinal chemistry findings.
- Examination of DYRK2's substrate interactions and downstream signaling pathways.
Main Results:
- DYRK2's role shifts from tumor suppressor to a promoter of cancer cell survival via proteostasis regulation.
- DYRK2 activates the 26S proteasome and stabilizes heat-shock factor 1, enhancing protein degradation and folding.
- Small-molecule DYRK2 inhibitors show anti-tumor activity in preclinical models of triple-negative breast cancer and myeloma.
Conclusions:
- The function of DYRK2 (anticancer vs. pro-cancer) is dependent on specific cancer (sub)types and spatiotemporal substrate interactions.
- DYRK2's involvement in proteostasis regulation presents a paradigm shift in understanding its oncogenic potential.
- Further research is needed to fully unravel the complex roles of DYRK2 and its substrates in tumorigenesis and to optimize therapeutic strategies targeting DYRK2.
Related Concept Videos
M-Cdk Drives Transition Into Mitosis
Cyclin-dependent kinases, or Cdks, work in concert with cyclins to control cell cycle transitions. M-Cdk, a complex of Cdk1 bound to M cyclin, is a well-known example of this coordinated control that drives the transition from the G2 to the M phase.
M cyclin...
Inhibition of Cdk Activity
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression
The mTOR pathway or the...
Mitogens and the Cell Cycle
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Adaptive Mechanisms in Cancer Cells
Some of the advantages that cancer cells have on normal cells include - enhanced ability to divide without terminally differentiating, induce new blood vessel formation,...

