[Paclitaxel liposome for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer]

To investigate the effect and safety of the 3-week paclitaxel liposome protocol in the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).

This retrospective study included 40 cases of CRPC treated by the 3-week paclitaxel liposome protocol from February 2014 to February 2019, which involved intravenous injection of 10 mg dexamethasone in 100 ml normal saline on the first day and that of metoclopramide and panxi tora azole on the second day, followed by about 3 hours of intravenous drip of paclitaxel liposome at 135 mg/m2 for a course of 3 weeks. During the follow-up period, the patients received detection of the serum PSA level before treatment and chest x-ray and whole-body bone scan every six months. After two courses of treatment, the patients were observed for the changes in the serum PSA level, relief of bone pain, quality of survival, overall survival rate, overall survival time and toxic reactions. The protocol was continued unless the patient underwent progression, refused for unacceptable toxicity, or died.

The patients were aged 59 to 79 (mean 68.80±5.67) years old, with the serum PSA level of (28.05 ± 3.22) μg/L at the baseline and (4.12 ± 0.23) μg/L after treatment. Thirty-eight of the patients were followed up for 3 to 33 (mean 12.2) months. PSA-based evaluation showed therapeutic effectiveness in 14 cases (35%), stable condition in 21 (52.5 %) and progression in 5 (12.5 %). Of the 18 patients with bone metastasis and pain, 16 (88.9 %) experienced relief of the symptoms and reduced the use of painkillers, with the bone pain scores of 5.20 ± 1.22 vs 2.79 ± 0.57 before and after treatment. By the end of the follow-up, the overall survival rate was 55.0% (22/40) and the median survival time was 17 months (95% CI: 13.4－24.6). During the treatment, no obvious adverse reactions were observed except for anemia in 1 case and hair loss in another.

For the treatment of CRPC in China, the 3-week paclitaxel liposome protocol has the advantages of desirable safety, low toxicity, acceptable drug tolerance and improved quality of survival, but its curative effect needs to be verified with more randomized clinical trials with larger samples and longer follow-ups.