Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 23, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
[Long-term recurrence rate and survival in different aged patients with breast cancer undergoing breast conserving
1Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Breast Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
Abstract:
Objective: To examine the difference of long-term recurrence rate and survivals between the young patients and the old patients undergoing breast conserving therapy (BCT). Methods: Women with primary invasive breast cancer receiving BCT between December 1999 and December 2014 were selected retrospectively from the database of Breast Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute. The median age of all patients was 47 years (range: 21 to 91 years). The cases were categorized according to age at diagnosis into two subgroups: the ≤40 years group and the>40 years group. A total of 2 778 patients were included: 677 patients in the ≤40 years group and 2 101 patients in the >40 years group. Clinicopathological characteristics between two groups were compared. The recurrence rate and survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The differences of outcomes were compared in different aged groups using the Log-rank test. Factors affecting local recurrence, distant disease-free survival (DDFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were assessed by multivariable Cox proportional hazard models. Results: Proportions of T1 (301/677 vs. 1 160/2 101, χ²=37.660, P<0.01), involved lymph node (314/677 vs. 713/2 101, χ²=34.966, P<0.01) hormone receptor-negative (490/677 vs. 1 581/2 101, χ²=6.981, P=0.030) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (413/677 vs. 1 010/2 101, χ²=34.272,P<0.01)in the ≤40 years group were higher than that in the>40 years group. Median follow-up duration was 102 months. No significant difference in 10-year local recurrence was found between the two groups (2.5% vs. 1.6%, P=0.147). Ten-year DDFS rate in the ≤40 years group and in the>40 years group was 90.6% and 95.3%, respectively (P<0.01). Ten-year DFS rate in the ≤40 years group and in the>40 years group was 86.5% and 91.1%, respectively (P=0.001). Ten-year BCSS rate in the ≤40 years group and in the >40 years group was 91.0% and 93.7%, respectively (P=0.105). Age was not the prognosis factor of local recurrence. Lymph node status (positive vs. negative: HR=2.73, 95%CI: 1.94 to 3.84, P<0.01), age (≤40 years vs.>40 years: HR=1.73, 95%CI: 1.24 to 2.42, P=0.001) and T stage (>2 cm vs. ≤2 cm: HR=1.61, 95%CI: 1.14 to 2.28, P=0.001) were the prognosis factors of DDFS, and also for DFS. Hormone receptor status (positive vs. negative: HR=0.54, 95%CI: 0.39 to 0.74, P<0.01), lymph node status (positive vs. negative: HR=2.94, 95%CI: 2.12 to 4.07, P<0.01) and T stage (>2 cm vs. ≤2 cm: HR=1.45, 95%CI: 1.05 to 2.01, P=0.025) were the prognosis factors of BCSS. Conclusions: The risk of local recurrence was similar between ≤40 years patient and >40 years patients receiving breast conserving therapy. Worse survivals in the ≤40 years group were found comparing to those in the >40 years group.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Longitudinal Research
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Cancer Stem Cells and Tumor Maintenance
Cancer stem cells are thought to originate from tissue-specific normal stem cells or progenitor cells. The normal stem cells usually reside in...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis

