Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Significant changes in Ritchie scores.

P A Lewis1, M M O'Sullivan, W R Rumfeld

  • 1Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.

British Journal of Rheumatology
|February 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Neonatal Nurse-Controlled Model of Analgesia to Manage Post-Operative Pain in the Surgical Neonate: A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial.

Journal of advanced nursing·2025
Same author

Safety and effectiveness of parent- or nurse-controlled analgesia in neonates: a systematic review.

JBI evidence synthesis·2021
Same author

Importance of assessing cytogenetic and molecular risk factors in acute myeloid leukemia therapy.

Journal of medicine and life·2019
Same author

The dream-lag effect: Selective processing of personally significant events during Rapid Eye Movement sleep, but not during Slow Wave Sleep.

Neurobiology of learning and memory·2015
Same author

An evaluation of benthic macroinvertebrate biomass methodology : Part 2. Field assessment and data evaluation.

Environmental monitoring and assessment·2013
Same author

An evaluation of benthic macroinvertebrate biomass methodology : Part 1. Laboratory analytical methods.

Environmental monitoring and assessment·2013
Same journal

Sensorineural hearing loss, iritis and ankylosing spondylitis.

British journal of rheumatology·1999
Same journal

Outcome in systemic vasculitis.

British journal of rheumatology·1999
Same journal

Infection with an unenveloped DNA virus (TTV) associated with non-A to G hepatitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

British journal of rheumatology·1999
Same journal

Aortitis in relapsing polychondritis.

British journal of rheumatology·1999
Same journal

Successful treatment with antithymocyte globulin and cyclosporin A of a severe aplastic anaemia associated with an eosinophilic fasciitis.

British journal of rheumatology·1999
Same journal

Haemophagocytic syndrome in a patient with dermatomyositis.

British journal of rheumatology·1999
See all related articles

This study on rheumatoid arthritis joint tenderness found high reliability between and within observers. Clinically significant changes in joint tenderness scores require careful interpretation of confidence intervals for accurate patient assessment.

Area of Science:

  • Rheumatology
  • Clinical Metrology

Background:

  • Assessing joint tenderness is crucial in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management.
  • Establishing reliable measurement tools is essential for clinical trials and patient care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the reliability of joint tenderness assessments in rheumatoid arthritis.
  • To calculate the 95% confidence intervals (CI) for score changes within and between observers.

Main Methods:

  • Forty-two RA patients were assessed over 14 weeks.
  • Two metrologists performed assessments three times weekly.
  • Intra- and inter-observer reliability and 95% CIs for score changes were calculated.

Main Results:

  • Close agreement was observed within and between metrologists.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The 95% CI for repeat measures was +/- 8.5 (same metrologist) and +/- 12 (different metrologist).
  • A clinically significant change (score change of 5) had a 95% CI of +/- 14 (one observer) and +/- 17 (different observers).
  • Conclusions:

    • The assessment of joint tenderness in RA demonstrates good reliability.
    • Confidence intervals for score changes are vital for interpreting clinical significance.
    • Other centers should establish their own CIs for score changes in clinical trials.