Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Deconvolution01:20

Deconvolution

419
Deconvolution, also known as inverse filtering, is the process of extracting the impulse response from known input and output signals. This technique is vital in scenarios where the system's characteristics are unknown, and they must be inferred from the observable signals.
Deconvolution involves several mathematical techniques to derive the impulse response. One common approach is polynomial division. In this method, the input and output sequences are treated as coefficients of...
419
Imaging Biological Samples with Optical Microscopy01:18

Imaging Biological Samples with Optical Microscopy

8.2K
Optical microscopy uses optic principles to provide detailed images of samples. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek designed the first compound optical microscope in the 17th century to visualize blood cells, bacteria, and yeast cells. In 1830, Joseph Jackson Lister created an essentially modern light microscope. The 20th century saw the development of microscopes with enhanced magnification and resolution.
In optical microscopy, the specimen to be viewed is placed on a glass slide and clipped on the stage...
8.2K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

7.8K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
7.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Baculovirus 25K hijacks host UAP56 to facilitate nuclear export of viral mRNA in insect cells.

Journal of virology·2025
Same author

A Case Report of Refractory <i>Mycobacterium wolinskyi</i> Knee Infection in a Metabolic Syndrome Patient: mNGS Diagnosis and Pharmacist-Guided Therapy.

Infection and drug resistance·2025
Same author

Balancing Efficacy and Safety for Non-ambulatory Thoracic OPLL: Superior Mobility with Circumferential Decompression but Higher Risks - A Retrospective Analysis.

Global spine journal·2025
Same author

Preservation of short-term cervical posterior muscle volume and cervical alignment: a comparison between three types of modified muscle-sparing laminoplasty and conventional open-door laminoplasty for multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy.

BMC musculoskeletal disorders·2025
Same author

Highly efficient removal of radioactive iodine from solution using in situ prepared Cu<sup>0</sup>@ACF adsorbent.

The Science of the total environment·2025
Same author

Interpersonal brain synchronization during sensorimotor synchronization in people with different aerobic fitness levels: A fNIRS-based hyperscanning study.

PloS one·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 23, 2025

Digital Inline Holographic Microscopy DIHM of Weakly-scattering Subjects
10:16

Digital Inline Holographic Microscopy DIHM of Weakly-scattering Subjects

Published on: February 8, 2014

12.5K

Denoising ghost imaging under a small sampling rate via deep learning for tracking and imaging moving objects.

Hong-Kang Hu, Shuai Sun, Hui-Zu Lin

    Optics Express
    |December 31, 2020
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study introduces a deep learning method to improve ghost imaging (GI) for moving objects. The technique significantly enhances image quality even with very low sampling rates, reducing data needs by two-thirds.

    More Related Videos

    Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography
    04:48

    Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography

    Published on: November 30, 2022

    3.1K
    Tracking Mouse Bone Marrow Monocytes In Vivo
    12:08

    Tracking Mouse Bone Marrow Monocytes In Vivo

    Published on: February 27, 2015

    9.8K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Nov 23, 2025

    Digital Inline Holographic Microscopy DIHM of Weakly-scattering Subjects
    10:16

    Digital Inline Holographic Microscopy DIHM of Weakly-scattering Subjects

    Published on: February 8, 2014

    12.5K
    Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography
    04:48

    Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography

    Published on: November 30, 2022

    3.1K
    Tracking Mouse Bone Marrow Monocytes In Vivo
    12:08

    Tracking Mouse Bone Marrow Monocytes In Vivo

    Published on: February 27, 2015

    9.8K

    Area of Science:

    • Computational imaging
    • Machine learning applications
    • Optical sensing

    Background:

    • Traditional ghost imaging (GI) demands extensive sampling, hindering applications with dynamic targets.
    • High sampling rates are a bottleneck for real-time imaging and processing of moving objects.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To develop and evaluate a deep learning approach for enhancing ghost imaging quality.
    • To significantly reduce the number of required samples in ghost imaging, particularly for dynamic scenes.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilized a convolutional denoising auto-encoder network trained on numerical data.
    • Employed the denoised outputs for trajectory reconstruction and image clarity enhancement.
    • Applied cross-correlation based ghost imaging for object reconstruction.

    Main Results:

    • Achieved enhanced image quality at sampling rates as low as 3.7%.
    • Successfully denoised blurry images acquired with minimal samplings.
    • Reduced the number of required samples by two-thirds for reconstructing moving objects.

    Conclusions:

    • Deep learning effectively denoises images and reconstructs moving objects in ghost imaging.
    • This method drastically lowers sampling requirements, improving efficiency and applicability.
    • The approach offers a viable solution for ghost imaging challenges with dynamic targets.