Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bias between enzymatic methods and the reference method for cholesterol.

M H Kroll1, H Lindsey, J Greene

  • 1Clinical Pathology Department, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.

Clinical Chemistry
|January 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary

Three enzymatic cholesterol assays showed positive biases compared to the CDC Reference Method. Calibration issues may explain some, but not all, of the observed differences in cholesterol measurement.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The economics of febrile neutropenia: implications for the use of colony-stimulating factors.

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)·1999
Same author

Direct contracts. Running for coverage.

Hospitals & health networks·1999
Same author

Quackery. Muddled miracles.

Hospitals & health networks·1999
Same author

A stormy season for rurals.

Hospitals & health networks·1998
Same author

Melatonin for the masses. Antiaging entrepreneurs peddle therapies that promise to cheat the clock.

Hospitals & health networks·1998
Same author

Nurse shortage. Where have all the RNs gone?

Hospitals & health networks·1998

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Chemistry
  • Biochemical Assays
  • Diagnostic Methodologies

Background:

  • Accurate serum cholesterol measurement is crucial for cardiovascular disease risk assessment.
  • Enzymatic methods are widely used for cholesterol determination, but their accuracy requires validation against reference standards.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the accuracy of four enzymatic serum cholesterol assays against the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Reference Method (modified Abell-Kendall).
  • To identify and quantify biases in enzymatic cholesterol measurement methods.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of 312 serum samples using four enzymatic methods: aca, TDx, SMAC, and RA-1000.
  • Comparison of results with the CDC modified Abell-Kendall Reference Method.
  • Statistical analysis to determine significant differences and identify bias types (proportional and/or systematic).

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The aca, TDx, and SMAC methods yielded significantly higher mean cholesterol values (2.27, 2.27, and 2.24 g/L) than the Reference Method (2.19 g/L) and RA-1000 (2.18 g/L).
  • Biased methods showed positive proportional and/or systematic biases, with results 2.6% to 4.9% higher than the Reference Method.
  • Calibration material assignments agreed with the Reference Method for SMAC and aca, but were lower for TDx and higher for RA-1000.

Conclusions:

  • Three enzymatic methods (aca, TDx, SMAC) exhibit positive biases in serum cholesterol measurement.
  • Misassignment of calibrators is unlikely to be the primary cause of bias for aca and SMAC.
  • Calibration issues may be a significant factor contributing to the bias observed with the TDx method.