How can recapitulation be reconciled with modern concepts of evolution?

To understand Haeckel's idea of recapitulation with modern evolutionary biology, one has to realize how evolutionarily conserved embryonic stages appear sequentially in developmental processes as chains of causality. Whether the idea of evolution was accepted or not, Haeckel and von Baer commonly saw an importance of a particularly conserved mid-embryonic stage in biphasic development of metazoans, the phylotype, that defines an animal phylum as the developmental source of a basic body plan. In an evolutionary context, the phylotypic stage was once understood by Haeckel to reflect the common ancestor of animal phyla, which went through hypermorphosis independently into various phyla. Recent comprehensive molecular studies, however, accumulated data to refute this idea. The conserved embryonic pattern does not reflect an ancestral adult morphology but appears to have arisen primarily as an embodiment of developmental constraints established through evolutionary processes. How the developmental burden results in a nested series of constraints will solve the recapitulative tendency of developmental programs.