Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 23, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
Published on: February 23, 2024
Evaluation of anatomical landmark position differences for head computed tomography: A reliability study among
K Ozturk1, A Spano1, D Nascene1
1Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Introduction:
In computed tomography (CT) imaging protocols, lack of practice standards and variability in head positioning may all yield substantial inter-study image variance in the clinical setting which may limit the diagnostic and comparative value of subsequent scans. We aimed to evaluate repeatability of multiplanar reformatting of head CT based on the tuberculum sella (TS) to internal occipital protuberance (IOP) reference line and reduce variance.
Methods:
Reference lines that correspond to the TS-IOP plane on high-resolution CT scans were reviewed by technologists manually to calculate Yaw (z-rotation, rotation along the superoinferior direction), Pitch (x-rotation, rotation along the left-right direction), and Roll (y-rotation, rotation along the anteroposterior direction) angles in this pre-post design intervention study. The Yaw, Pitch, and Roll angles deviating from the reference TS-IOP in the head CT images before and after technologist training were measured with the technologists' actual graphical prescriptions, and their differences were calculated with t-tests. The intra-rater agreement was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
Results:
Mean pitch, yaw, and roll before technologist training was 6.7° ± 5.4°, 0.9° ± 1.5°, and 1.1° ± 1.2° and after training were 3.2° ± 2.6°, 0.6° ± 1.1°, and 0.6° ± 1.1°, respectively. Technologist training resulted in a significant decrease in pitch (p < 0.001) and roll (p = 0.001) inter-subject variability with respect to the TS-IOP line, however no significant difference for the yaw correction (p = 0.065) was noted. Intra-rater agreement regarding the reproducibility of TS-IOP reformation was excellent (ICC>0.950).
Conclusion:
TS-IOP reference line corrected for direct roll, yaw, and pitch can be readily achieved by trained technologists.
Implications For Practice:
Adoption of the TS-IOP reference line should facilitate intra- and intermodality comparisons, leading to more reproducible and readily interpretable CT images.
More Related Videos
10:23Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans
Published on: September 8, 2023
07:13Author Spotlight: An Efficient and Robust Software for Automated Fusion of Multiple Preclinical Imaging Modalities
Published on: October 27, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography