Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.3K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.3K
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling01:08

NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling

2.6K
The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved...
2.6K
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals01:02

¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals

1.3K
Spin systems where the difference in chemical shifts of the coupled nuclei is greater than ten times J are called first-order spin systems. These nuclei are weakly coupled, and their chemical shifts and coupling constant can generally be estimated from the well-separated signals in the spectrum.
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
1.3K
Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals II03:35

Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals II

43.3K
sp3d and sp3d 2 Hybridization
43.3K
¹H NMR Signal Multiplicity: Splitting Patterns01:13

¹H NMR Signal Multiplicity: Splitting Patterns

6.3K
When protons A and X are coupled, their nuclear spin energy levels are slightly modified. This is because the energy required to excite proton A to a spin state parallel to proton X is slightly different from the energy required for it to become anti-parallel to spin X. Consequently, there are two possible excitation frequencies for A (A1 and A2), depending on the spin state of X, and vice versa. The mutual nature of coupling implies that the difference between frequencies A1 and A2, indicated...
6.3K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)01:22

Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)

1.3K
Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
1.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Synthesis of a Series of Ln(III) (Ln = La, Ce, Lu) Aryl Complexes and Analysis of Their Ln-L Bonding Using Multinuclear NMR Spectroscopy and DFT Calculations.

Inorganic chemistry·2026
Same author

Comparison of Bonding in Isostructural Cerium and Thorium Parent Amide Complexes.

Inorganic chemistry·2026
Same author

Elucidating metal (Zr, Hf, Th, U)-hydride covalency using <sup>1</sup>H NMR chemical shifts and density functional calculations.

Communications chemistry·2026
Same author

Leveraging the redox activities of cerium and dibenzotetrathiafulvalene to discover a photo-responsive magnetic material.

Chemical science·2026
Same author

Reassessing DFT Rankings for Ambimodal Cycloadditions: The Impact of Accurate CCSD(T) Benchmarks and New Doubly-Hybrid Functionals.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
Same author

Effects of Structure and Bonding on <sup>195</sup>Pt Magnetic Shielding Tensors: Insights from Relativistic DFT and Localized Molecular Orbital Analysis.

Inorganic chemistry·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 23, 2025

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids
08:04

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids

Published on: May 27, 2020

8.8K

Electron-Nucleus Hyperfine Coupling Calculated from Restricted Active Space Wavefunctions and an Exact Two-Component

Rulin Feng1, Thomas J Duignan1, Jochen Autschbach1

  • 1Department of Chemistry, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York 14260-3000, United States.

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
|January 1, 2021
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new computational method for calculating nuclear hyperfine magnetic properties using exact two-component relativistic operators. This advancement improves accuracy for a wider range of elements in quantum chemistry.

More Related Videos

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
12:11

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry

Published on: April 8, 2020

8.5K
Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels
11:19

Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels

Published on: July 4, 2016

10.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 23, 2025

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids
08:04

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids

Published on: May 27, 2020

8.8K
Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
12:11

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry

Published on: April 8, 2020

8.5K
Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels
11:19

Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels

Published on: July 4, 2016

10.9K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Chemistry
  • Quantum Mechanics
  • Relativistic Effects

Background:

  • Accurate calculation of nuclear hyperfine magnetic properties is crucial in chemistry.
  • Previous methods using nonrelativistic operators had limited applicability, especially for heavy elements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and implement an improved computational method for nuclear hyperfine magnetic properties.
  • To incorporate exact two-component (X2C) relativistic nuclear hyperfine magnetic field operators into ab initio wavefunction calculations.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized X2C relativistic operators within multireference restricted active space (RAS) calculations.
  • Treated spin-orbit coupling via RAS state interaction (SO-RASSI).
  • Implemented the method in the OpenMolcas program.

Main Results:

  • Successfully calculated electron-nucleus hyperfine coupling constants for various systems.
  • Demonstrated good agreement with experimental data for main group elements, transition metals, lanthanides, and actinides.
  • The new method overcomes limitations of previous nonrelativistic approaches.

Conclusions:

  • The developed X2C relativistic method provides accurate nuclear hyperfine magnetic properties.
  • This approach significantly expands the applicability of relativistic calculations for hyperfine properties.
  • Sufficient spin polarization in the active space is key for reliable results.