Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 23, 2025

07:41
Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems
Published on: July 30, 2019
7.8K
Direct effects influence larval salamander size and density more than indirect effects
Thomas L Anderson1,2, Brittany H Ousterhout3, Freya E Rowland3,4
1Division of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA. thander@siue.edu.
Oecologia
|January 2, 2021
Summary
Direct effects were often stronger than indirect effects on salamander populations. Habitat and density factors can negate impacts, leading to weaker overall population dynamics in natural communities.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Population Dynamics
- Community Ecology
Background:
- Direct and indirect ecological effects shape populations and communities.
- In situ evaluation of these effects is less common than experimental approaches.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine direct and indirect effects on larval salamander density and body size.
- To quantify the relative importance of these pathways in natural pond ecosystems.
Main Methods:
- Surveyed over 150 ponds in Missouri, USA (2012-2014).
- Measured larval density, body size, co-occurring species density, and habitat features.
- Utilized structural equation modeling to analyze direct and indirect pathways.
Main Results:
- Both larval density and body size were influenced by direct and indirect effects.
- Direct effects were generally stronger than indirect effects.
- Habitat and density variables sometimes canceled each other's impacts, weakening overall effects.
Conclusions:
- Direct effects are as important, or more so, than indirect effects on larval salamanders.
- Individual relationships can sum to produce negligible net population patterns.
- Observational studies are crucial for understanding effect magnitudes in natural communities.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Selection
43.2K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
43.2K
Population Growth
26.6K
Population size is dynamic, increasing with birth rates and immigration, and decreasing with death rates and emigration. In ideal conditions with unlimited resources, populations can increase exponentially, which plots as a J-shaped growth rate curve of population size against time. This type of curve is characteristic of newly-introduced invasive species, or populations that have suffered catastrophic declines and are rebounding.
26.6K
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
7.1K
Although the genetic makeup of an organism plays a major role in determining the phenotype, there are also several environmental factors, such as temperature, oxygen availability, presence of mutagens, that can alter an organism’s phenotype.
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
7.1K
Frequency-dependent Selection
22.7K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
22.7K
Testing a Claim about Mean: Known Population SD
3.0K
A complete procedure of testing the hypothesis about a population mean is explained here.
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be distributed normally. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. The sample size needed to be higher than 30, and most importantly, the population standard deviation should be already known.
In most realistic situations, the population standard deviation is often unknown, but in rare circumstances, when it...
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be distributed normally. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. The sample size needed to be higher than 30, and most importantly, the population standard deviation should be already known.
In most realistic situations, the population standard deviation is often unknown, but in rare circumstances, when it...
3.0K
Life Histories
22.0K
Overview
22.0K

