Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 23, 2025
Dried Blood Spots - Preparing and Processing for Use in Immunoassays and in Molecular Techniques
Published on: March 13, 2015
Field performance of HBsAg rapid diagnostic tests in rural Ethiopia
Stian Magnus Staurung Orlien1, Tekabe Abdosh Ahmed2, Nejib Yusuf Ismael3
1Department of Paediatrics, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway; The Morbid Obesity Center, Children and Adolescents, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway; Regional Centre for Imported and Tropical Diseases, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo, Norway.
Abstract:
Point-of-care rapid diagnostic tests (POC-RDTs) are widely used to screen and diagnose hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and are often the only available diagnostic tools in resource-limited settings. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of three hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) POC-RDTs (Healgen®, Advanced Quality™ and Determine™) in an area with high prevalence of HBV in eastern Ethiopia. Results were compared with a commercial enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as gold standard. Quantification of HBsAg was performed in false negative samples. A total of 511 subjects were screened, of whom 81 (15.9 %) were HBsAg-positive with the gold standard. All three POC-RDTs were positive in 65 of the 81 positive samples, yielding a sensitivity (95 % confidence interval) of 80.2 % (70.3-87.5) and a specificity of 99.8 % (98.7-100 for Healgen® and Determine™; 98.6-100 for Advanced Quality™). False negatives were observed in 16 patients associated with low levels of HBsAg (median 1.5 IU/mL). All three POC-RDTs had reasonably high sensitivity and excellent specificity, but false negative results were observed in patients with low titres of HBsAg. Thus, these POC-RDTs might be useful to identify patients in need of HBV treatment, but cannot be recommended as blood donor screening tests.
