Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 23, 2025
Dynamic Monitoring of Seroconversion using a Multianalyte Immunobead Assay for Covid-19
Published on: February 16, 2022
Two SARS-CoV-2 IgG immunoassays comparison and time-course profile of antibodies response
Ruggero Dittadi1, Haleh Afshar1, Paolo Carraro1
1Laboratory Medicine Unit, Ospedale dell'Angelo, Mestre, Italy.
Introduction:
The persistence of circulating antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 infection is not yet well known. We compare the results of 2 automated systems for the determination of IgG against SARS CoV-2 and assess the time-course of the IgG response.
Methods:
IgG were measured in 103 specimens of 55 patients with COVID-19 (time from the symptoms' onset: 3-187 days) using the automated tests "Abbott SARS-COV-2 IgG" and "MAGLUMI 2019-nCoV IgG".
Results:
The 2 methods had a concordance of 90.3%, but the quantitative correlation, although significant, showed dispersed results. All the specimens resulted positive after 17 days. However, the median concentrations of IgG rapidly increased up to 20 days and decreased for Maglumi IgG while Abbott IgG showed a constant trend up to 85 days, and then slowly declined.
Conclusions:
The titer of IgG against SARS-CoV-2 may significantly and rapidly decrease, but with a very different time-course depending on the method used for the determination.
More Related Videos
07:08A Rapid, Multiplex Dual Reporter IgG and IgM SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization Assay for a Multiplexed Bead-Based Flow Analysis System
Published on: April 6, 2021
10:25Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibodies using High-Throughput Fluorescent Imaging of Pseudovirus Infection
Published on: June 5, 2021