Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 23, 2025
Multifocal Electroretinograms
Published on: December 4, 2011
Correlations among metamorphopsia test scores, optical coherence tomography findings and multifocal electroretinogram
Jung Woo Lee1, Sung Yong Park2, Patrick S Kim3
1Department of Ophthalmology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan Hospital, 31, Suncheonhyang 6-gil, Dongnam-gu, Cheonan-si, Chungcheongnam-do, Cheonan, 31151, South Korea.
Purpose:
To quantify metamorphopsia with a novel objective method in patients with epiretinal membrane (ERM) and to compare the relationships among metamorphopsia scores, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings, and multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) results.
Methods:
This study included 52 eyes of 52 patients with idiopathic ERM who underwent comprehensive ophthalmologic examinations, including measurement of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), OCT, and mfERG. The degree of metamorphopsia was quantified using MonPack One® (Metrovision, Perenchies, France). On the topographic map of the early treatment diabetic retinopathy (ETDRS) grid, retinal thickness in the central, superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal subfields were measured, and metamorphopsia scores for each corresponding subfield were also obtained. The amplitudes and implicit times of mERG were elicited from each subfield. Then, the correlations among metamorphopsia scores, OCT findings, and mfERG responses were analyzed.
Results:
The mean age of the patients was 65.3 ± 18.5 y, and the average metamorphopsia score of the individual subfields was 2.03 ± 1.18. Initial BCVA was 0.50 ± 0.12 logMAR, but there was no significant correlation between metamorphopsia scores and BCVA. The metamorphopsia scores from the central subfields showed significant correlations with central retinal thickness (CRT) (p = 0.001). The mean metamorphopsia scores in the central subfield showed a significant relationship with the mean N1 and P1 amplitudes (p = 0.001, p = 0.048, respectively), while no relationship was observed between metamorphopsia scores and mfERG amplitudes in other subfields.
Conclusions:
The degree of metamorphopsia in patients with ERM could be objectively quantified in each subfield using a novel metamorphopsia test. The metamorphopsia scores were significantly correlated with retinal thickness, especially at the central subfields, and the scores in the central subfields were significantly correlated with the N1 and P1 amplitudes of mfERG. Thus, the metamorphopsia test can be a useful method to evaluate metamorphopsia symptoms for patients with ERM.
