Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 23, 2025

Ultrasonographic Assessment During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Published on: October 24, 2020
Validation of two pediatric resuscitation tapes
Glorilyn Joyce Ong1, Elaine Dy1
1Department of Emergency Medicine Acute and Critical Care Institute The Medical City-Ortigas Pasig City Philippines.
Insights
The PAWPER XL-MAC tape is a more accurate tool for estimating Filipino children's weight than the Broselow tape. Both tapes overestimate weight in underweight children but underestimate it in overweight or obese children.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Clinical Assessment Tools
- Anthropometry
Background:
- Accurate weight estimation is crucial for pediatric emergency care.
- Existing tools like the Broselow tape have limitations in diverse populations.
- The Pediatric Advanced Weight Prediction in the Emergency Room eXtra Length-Mid-arm Circumference (PAWPER XL-MAC) tape offers a potential improvement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the accuracy of the Broselow tape and the PAWPER XL-MAC tape in estimating the actual weights of Filipino children.
- To evaluate the performance of these weight estimation tools across different age and Body Mass Index (BMI) for age groups.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, observational, cross-sectional study was conducted in a pediatric emergency department in the Philippines.
- Mean Percentage Error (MPE) and Modified Bland-Altman analysis were used to assess bias and agreement.
- The proportion of weight estimates within 10% (p10) and 20% (p20) of actual weight determined overall accuracy.
Main Results:
- The PAWPER XL-MAC tape demonstrated better accuracy, with 79.6% of estimates within 10% and 96.8% within 20% of actual weight.
- Both tapes overestimated weight in underweight children and underestimated it in overweight and obese children.
- The PAWPER XL-MAC tape showed less bias (1.3%) compared to the Broselow tape (0.4%) in estimating Filipino children's weight.
Conclusions:
- The PAWPER XL-MAC tape is a more reliable weight estimation tool for Filipino children compared to the Broselow tape.
- Both tools exhibit systematic errors, overestimating in underweight and underestimating in overweight/obese children.
- Clinical application of PAWPER XL-MAC tape is recommended for improved weight estimation in this population.
Objective:
This study aims to compare the actual weights of Filipino children with their estimated weights obtained from the Broselow tape and the Pediatric Advanced Weight Prediction in the Emergency Room eXtra Length-Mid-arm Circumference (PAWPER XL-MAC) tape.
Methods:
A prospective, observational, cross-sectional study conducted among Filipino children admitted at the Pediatric Emergency Department (ED) of The Medical City in Pasig City, Philippines. Mean percentage error (MPE) determined bias. Modified Bland-Altman analysis was used to perform a visual comparison of the bias and extent of agreement. The proportion of weight estimates within 10% (p 10) and within 20% (p 20) of actual weight was calculated to determine the overall accuracy.
Results:
A total of 220 Filipino children (63.2% male) were recruited. Both the Broselow and PAWPER XL-MAC tapes overestimate the actual weight by an average of 0.4% (95% limit of agreement [LOA] -29.4 to 30.2) and 1.3% (95% LOA -15.3 to 17.9) respectively. Across body mass index (BMI) groups, both tapes overestimate (MPE: +19.2 and +9.3) weight among underweight children and underestimate (MPE: -13.2 and -3.5; MPE: -18.6 and -5.5) weight among overweight and obese children. In measuring estimated weight within 10% and 20% of actual weight, the PAWPER XL-MAC performed best (79.6% and 96.8%).
Conclusion:
The PAWPER XL-MAC tape performed better as a weight estimation tool compared to Broselow tape across different age groups and BMI-for-age groups of Filipino children. Both tapes tend to overestimate weight among younger and underweight children while underestimating weight among ages 7 to 10 years old, overweight, or obese children.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Errors in Taping
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation V: Advanced Airway Management Techniques
Assessment of apical pulse
Assessing the apical pulse is a critical nursing procedure, particularly indicated for:

