Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 23, 2025

12:16
Robust 3D DNA FISH Using Directly Labeled Probes
Published on: August 15, 2013
35.1K
GC and Repeats Profiling along Chromosomes-The Future of Fish Compositional Cytogenomics
Dominik Matoulek1, Veronika Borůvková1, Konrad Ocalewicz2
1Faculty of Science, University of Hradec Kralove, 500 03 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Genes
|January 5, 2021
Summary
New fish cytogenetics research reveals that high GC-percentage (GC%) in repetitive DNA sequences homogenizes chromosome patterns, hindering G-banding. This finding may explain why traditional fish chromosome banding techniques have been unsuccessful.
Area of Science:
- Cytogenetics
- Genomics
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- Fish cytogenetics traditionally relies on chromosome morphology due to difficulties in G-banding.
- The underlying reasons for the failure of G-banding in fish remain unclear.
- Advancements in chromosome-level genome assemblies offer new avenues for investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the reasons behind the failure of G-banding in fish chromosomes.
- To develop a computational tool for analyzing GC percentage and repeat content in fish genomes.
- To correlate genomic features with observed cytogenetic banding patterns.
Main Methods:
- Development of a Python tool to visualize and quantify GC percentage (GC%) and repeat proportion (rep%) along chromosomes.
- Application of a non-overlapping sliding window approach for detailed genomic profiling.
- Analysis of GC% and rep% in both unique and repetitive DNA sequences.
Main Results:
- Fish chromosomes exhibit homogenized GC% due to repetitive DNA sequences.
- A wider scattering of GC% values was observed along fish chromosomes compared to expectations for G-banding.
- Occasional banding patterns were detected, potentially missed by traditional methods.
Conclusions:
- The homogenization of GC% by repetitive DNA is a likely cause for the inability to achieve G-banding in fish.
- The developed tool provides insights into fish chromosome organization and GC% distribution.
- Further research may refine cytogenetic analysis in fish by considering these genomic features.
Related Concept Videos
Karyotyping
66.3K
Overview
66.3K
Polytene Chromosomes
10.6K
Polytene chromosomes are giant interphase chromosomes with several DNA strands placed side by side. They were discovered in the year 1881 by Balbiani in salivary glands, intestine, muscles, malpighian tubules, and hypoderm of larvae Chironomus plumosus. Hence, these are also called "Salivary gland chromosomes." These are found in insects of the order Diptera and Collembola; in certain organs of mammals; and synergids, antipodes of flowering plants. Polytene chromosomes are also...
10.6K
Lampbrush Chromosomes
8.3K
In 1882, Flemming observed lampbrush chromosomes (LBC) in salamander eggs. Later in 1892, Rückert observed LBCs in shark egg cells and coined the term "lampbrush chromosomes" because they looked like brushes used to clean kerosene lamps.
LBCs are made up of two pairs of conjugating homologous chromatids. Each chromatid consists of alternatively positioned regions of condensed-inactive chromatin and loosely placed-active side loops, which can be contracted and extended. The loops...
LBCs are made up of two pairs of conjugating homologous chromatids. Each chromatid consists of alternatively positioned regions of condensed-inactive chromatin and loosely placed-active side loops, which can be contracted and extended. The loops...
8.3K
FISH - Fluorescent In-situ Hybridization
22.9K
Fluorescence in situ hybridization, or FISH, was developed in the early 1980s and has quickly become one of the most widely used techniques in cytogenetics. Labeled probes are used to bind complementary DNA or RNA sequences on a chromosome or in a region within a cell. Earlier, the probes could only be obtained by cloning or reverse transcription of a DNA template. Currently, the probe oligonucleotides can be synthesized synthetically. Additionally, with the advancement of optical techniques,...
22.9K

