False Rape Allegation and Regret: A Theoretical Model Based on Cognitive Dissonance.

Area of Science:

• Psychology
• Sociology
• Criminology

Background:

• False rape allegations (FRA) are a complex phenomenon with various contributing factors.
• Existing literature often focuses on interpersonal dynamics, neglecting intrapersonal psychological processes.
• Cognitive dissonance, a state of mental discomfort, plays a crucial role in understanding these motivations.

Purpose of the Study:

• To propose a novel model illustrating the pathway from regretful consensual intercourse to false rape allegations.
• To integrate an intrapersonal perspective of regret, rooted in cognitive dissonance, with existing interpersonal factors.
• To provide a framework for understanding and potentially preventing FRA stemming from post-coital regret.

Main Methods:

• A comprehensive literature review was conducted to identify motives for FRA.
• Key factors contributing to regret-based FRA were extracted and analyzed.
• A chronological model was developed, structuring these factors based on their causal relationships.
• Thirteen plausible scenarios were constructed to demonstrate the model's applicability.

Main Results:

• The model highlights regret, stemming from cognitive dissonance, as a significant motivator for FRA.
• It elucidates how the gap between perceived behavior and social norms can induce shame and subsequent regret.
• The model successfully integrates intrapersonal regret with interpersonal factors in a structured framework.

Conclusions:

• The proposed model offers a nuanced understanding of the psychological mechanisms underlying FRA.
• It emphasizes the role of cognitive dissonance and regret in the decision-making process leading to false allegations.
• The model provides a foundation for future research and targeted prevention strategies for FRA.