Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 23, 2025

A Cell Culture Model for Producing High Titer Hepatitis E Virus Stocks
Published on: June 26, 2020
Sex Differences in Extrahepatic Outcomes After Antiviral Treatment for Hepatitis C
Jia Li1, Stuart C Gordon2,3, Yueren Zhou1
1Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Insights
Antiviral treatment for hepatitis C (HCV) significantly reduces cardiovascular and renal disease risks, especially in women. Achieving sustained virological response (SVR) is most protective, while treatment failure increases risks, particularly for women on interferon-based therapies.
Area of Science:
- Hepatology
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Nephrology
Background:
- Sex differences in cardiovascular and renal disease are known, but their impact on hepatitis C (HCV) antiviral treatment outcomes remains understudied.
- HCV infection is associated with increased risks of cardiovascular events and kidney disease.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate sex-specific differences in the risk of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and ischemic stroke following antiviral treatment for HCV.
- To evaluate the impact of treatment response (sustained virological response [SVR] vs. treatment failure) on these outcomes in men and women.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of a large US-based multisite cohort of 15,295 HCV patients, with approximately 40% women.
- Inverse probability-weighting was used to address treatment selection bias.
- The Fine-Gray method was employed to estimate the effect of treatment on cumulative incidence, with death as a competing risk.
Main Results:
- Sustained virological response (SVR) significantly reduced the risk of ACS, ESRD, and ischemic stroke for both sexes, with greater risk reduction observed in women.
- Female patients achieving SVR had a substantially lower risk of ACS compared to males.
- SVR was most protective against ESRD, with women experiencing a 66%-68% risk reduction versus 38%-42% in men.
- Interferon (IFN)-based treatment failure significantly increased risks of all outcomes by 50%-100% in women, including a 63% increased risk of ACS.
Conclusions:
- SVR effectively reduces the risk of major extrahepatic complications of HCV, with a pronounced protective effect in female patients.
- The significantly elevated risks associated with IFN treatment failure in women highlight the critical need to prioritize them for direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy, regardless of fibrosis stage.
Introduction:
Despite recognized differences in the rates of cardiovascular and renal disease between men and women in the general population, studies of the downstream effects of antiviral treatment for hepatitis C (HCV) have not investigated differences in outcomes based on sex. We analyzed sex differences in risk of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and ischemic stroke by treatment and response in a large US-based multisite cohort of HCV patients.
Methods:
Observation started at the HCV diagnosis date (untreated) or last antiviral treatment start (treated). Treatment selection bias was addressed using an inverse probability-weighting approach. We estimated the effect of treatment on the cumulative incidence of outcomes using the Fine-Gray method (subdistribution hazard ratios [sHR] and 95% confidence intervals [95% CI]). Death was a competing risk.
Results:
Roughly 40% of 15,295 HCV patients were women. After controlling for other risk factors, sustained virological response (SVR) (interferon-based [IFN] or direct-acting antiviral [DAA]) significantly reduced risk of all outcomes, particularly among female patients. Female patients who achieved SVR after IFN-based treatment had significantly lower risk of ACS compared with male patients with SVR from either treatment type (sHR 0.45 [95% CI 0.35-0.59] vs 0.81 [95% CI 0.69-0.96, for DAA SVR] and sHR 0.72 [95% 0.62, 0.85, for IFN SVR]). Successful treatment seemed to be most protective against ESRD; female patients who achieved SVR were at 66%-68% lower risk than untreated patients (sHR 0.32 [95% CI 0.17-0.60 for DAA SVR] and 0.34 [95% CI 0.20-0.58 for IFN SVR]), whereas men were at 38%-42% lower risk (sHR 0.62 [95% CI 0.46-0.85 for DAA SVR] and 0.58 [95% CI 0.43-0.76 for IFN SVR]). IFN treatment failure significantly increased risk of all outcomes by 50%-100% among female patients. Compared with no treatment, female patients who experienced IFN treatment failure were at 63% increased risk of ACS (sHR 1.63 [95% CI 1.35-1.96]), almost twice the risk of ESRD (sHR 1.95 [95% CI 1.43-2.66]) and 51% increased risk of stroke (sHR 1.49 [95%CI 1.11-2.00]).
Discussion:
SVR reduced the risk of extrahepatic complications, particularly in females. The significantly increased risk associated with IFN TF in women-a subset who represented roughly 10% of that group-underscores the importance of prioritizing these patients for DAA treatment irrespective of the fibrosis stage.
Related Concept Videos
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Dose Adjustments Due to Hepatic Impairment
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Drug Dosing and Hepatic Blood Flow
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test
Hepatic Drug Excretion: Influencing Factors
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Active Drug, Metabolite and Fraction of Metabolized Drug
Retrovirus Life Cycles

