Surgical management of infected abdominal wall mesh: an analysis using the American Hernia Society Quality

C L Devin1, M A Olson2, L Tastaldi3

  • 1Department of Surgery, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 1100 Walnut Street-Suite 500, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.

Abstract

Insights

Incisional hernia repair with infected mesh removal showed no significant difference in short-term complications between complete repair (CR) and partial repair (PR) strategies. Both approaches offer comparable outcomes for managing infected abdominal mesh complications.

Area of Science:

  • Abdominal surgery
  • Hernia repair
  • Infectious disease management

Background:

  • Infected abdominal mesh presents a complex surgical challenge.
  • Management strategies for infected mesh removal and hernia repair vary.
  • Understanding outcomes of different repair techniques is crucial for patient care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine management patterns and 30-day outcomes for infected mesh removal with concomitant incisional hernia repair.
  • To compare outcomes between complete repair (CR) and partial repair (PR) strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing infected mesh removal and incisional hernia repair from the American Hernia Society Quality Collaborative.
  • Defined CR as fascial closure with mesh; PR as fascial closure without mesh or no fascial closure with mesh.
  • Compared 30-day outcomes including complications, surgical site infections, and readmissions between CR and PR groups.

Main Results:

  • 282 patients were analyzed: 136 in CR and 146 in PR.
  • Groups had similar comorbidities but differed in wound class and concomitant colorectal procedures.
  • No statistically significant differences were observed in length of stay, overall complications, surgical site infections, surgical site occurrences, or 30-day readmissions between CR and PR.

Conclusions:

  • Incisional hernia repair following infected mesh removal can be performed with either complete or partial repair techniques.
  • Short-term outcomes and complication rates are comparable between CR and PR strategies in the presence of infection.
  • These findings support flexibility in surgical approach based on individual patient and wound characteristics.

Related Concept Videos

Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management01:21

Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management

Surgical interventions for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which includes ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, are essential in managing symptoms and addressing complications. The selection of surgical procedures is contingent upon the specific conditions and complications that stem from these illnesses.
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
303
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management01:25

Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management

Procedures for Kidney StonesMedical intervention is necessary when kidney stones or renal calculi are too large to pass spontaneously (typically greater than 5 millimeters) when stones are accompanied by symptomatic infection (such as fever or pyelonephritis), when they impair kidney function, or when they cause persistent symptoms like severe pain, nausea, or urinary retention. Additionally, patients with only one kidney or those who cannot be treated with medical management also require...
139
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care01:26

Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care

Aneurysm management involves either conservative medical therapy or surgical intervention, depending on the size and symptoms of the aneurysm. Conservative management is generally reserved for smaller, asymptomatic aneurysms, while larger or symptomatic aneurysms often necessitate surgical repair.Conservative Medical TherapyFor small, asymptomatic aneurysms, particularly abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) less than 5.5 centimeters in diameter, conservative medical therapy is recommended. This...
112