Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 23, 2025

Application of a New Mesh Fixation Method in Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair
Published on: December 23, 2022
Surgical management of infected abdominal wall mesh: an analysis using the American Hernia Society Quality
C L Devin1, M A Olson2, L Tastaldi3
1Department of Surgery, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 1100 Walnut Street-Suite 500, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Introduction:
Several management strategies exist for the treatment of infected abdominal mesh. Using the American Hernia Society Quality Collaborative, we examined management patterns and 30-day outcomes of infected mesh removal with concomitant incisional hernia repair.
Methods:
All patients undergoing incisional hernia repair with removal of infected mesh were identified. A complete repair (CR) was defined as fascial closure with mesh; a partial repair (PR) was defined as fascial closure without mesh or no fascial closure with mesh. A two-tailed p value less than or equal to 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results:
A total of 282 patients were identified: 136 patients in CR group and 146 patients in PR group. Patients had similar comorbidities but differed in wound class (class IV: 55% CR vs 83% SR, p < 0.001) and incidence of associated concomitant colorectal procedures (5% CR vs 18% SR, p = 0.015). Sublay placement was used primarily in CR (94%) compared to PR (52% inlay, 48% sublay). When comparing CR to PR, length of stay (median 6, p = 0.69), complications (40% vs 44%, p = 0.44), surgical site infections (16% vs 21%, p = 0.27), surgical site occurrence (30% vs 35%, p = 0.45), and readmission within 30 days (9% vs. 13%) were not statistically different.
Conclusions:
Analysis of data from a multicenter hernia registry comparing CR and PR during infected mesh removal and concurrent incisional hernia repair has not identified higher rates of short-term complications between groups in the presence of infection.
Insights
Incisional hernia repair with infected mesh removal showed no significant difference in short-term complications between complete repair (CR) and partial repair (PR) strategies. Both approaches offer comparable outcomes for managing infected abdominal mesh complications.
Area of Science:
- Abdominal surgery
- Hernia repair
- Infectious disease management
Background:
- Infected abdominal mesh presents a complex surgical challenge.
- Management strategies for infected mesh removal and hernia repair vary.
- Understanding outcomes of different repair techniques is crucial for patient care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine management patterns and 30-day outcomes for infected mesh removal with concomitant incisional hernia repair.
- To compare outcomes between complete repair (CR) and partial repair (PR) strategies.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing infected mesh removal and incisional hernia repair from the American Hernia Society Quality Collaborative.
- Defined CR as fascial closure with mesh; PR as fascial closure without mesh or no fascial closure with mesh.
- Compared 30-day outcomes including complications, surgical site infections, and readmissions between CR and PR groups.
Main Results:
- 282 patients were analyzed: 136 in CR and 146 in PR.
- Groups had similar comorbidities but differed in wound class and concomitant colorectal procedures.
- No statistically significant differences were observed in length of stay, overall complications, surgical site infections, surgical site occurrences, or 30-day readmissions between CR and PR.
Conclusions:
- Incisional hernia repair following infected mesh removal can be performed with either complete or partial repair techniques.
- Short-term outcomes and complication rates are comparable between CR and PR strategies in the presence of infection.
- These findings support flexibility in surgical approach based on individual patient and wound characteristics.
More Related Videos
10:52Laparoscopic Repair of Para-Esophageal Hernia Using Absorbable Biosynthetic Mesh
Published on: September 11, 2021
20:33A Case Series of Successful Abdominal Closure Utilizing a Novel Technique Combining a Mechanical Closure System with a Biologic Xenograft that Accelerates Wound Healing
Published on: July 4, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care