Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How Expensive is ENT Surgeons' Involvement in Retrosigmoid Craniotomies? A Time-Driven Activity-Based Cost Analysis.

Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base·2026
Same author

Which spine surgeries belong in the ambulatory surgical center? Determining economic viability using time-driven activity-based costing.

Neurosurgical focus·2026
Same author

Defining the value of elective lumbar fusion: a systematic review of existing methodologies and framework for the Operative Value Index.

Journal of neurosurgical sciences·2026
Same author

High flow, at a higher cost? A pilot study comparing direct vs. indirect bypass for Moyamoya disease using time-driven activity-based costing.

Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia·2026
Same author

Can We Finally Quantify Value for Lumbar Fusions? Introducing the Operative Value Index (OVI).

Clinical spine surgery·2026
Same author

Return to Work Following Novel Lumbar Total Joint Replacement.

Clinical spine surgery·2025
Same journal

Early Implant Fixation as a Clinically Important Endpoint - A Commentary on "Romosozumab Enhances Implant Stability in Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporotic Bone: A Rabbit Model Study".

Neurospine·2026
Same journal

A Commentary on "Romosozumab Enhances Implant Stability in Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporotic Bone: A Rabbit Model Study".

Neurospine·2026
Same journal

Reply Letter: A Commentary on "Disuse Bone Loss in Fusion Constructs After Multilevel Lumbar Fusion: A Computed Tomography Hounsfield Unit Analysis".

Neurospine·2026
Same journal

A Commentary on "Disuse Bone Loss in Fusion Constructs After Multilevel Lumbar Fusion: A Computed Tomography Hounsfield Unit Analysis".

Neurospine·2026
Same journal

Reply Letter: A Commentary on "Biomechanical Impact of Cement Augmentation on Pedicle Screw Fixation and Adjacent Segment Disease in Multilevel Lumbar Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis".

Neurospine·2026
Same journal

Enhancing Predictive Accuracy in Finite Element Analysis of Cement Augmentation: Methodological Considerations - A Commentary on "Biomechanical Impact of Cement Augmentation on Pedicle Screw Fixation and Adjacent Segment Disease in Multilevel Lumbar Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis".

Neurospine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 22, 2025

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
07:11

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants

Published on: May 23, 2020

7.7K

Cervical Deformity: Evaluation, Classification, and Surgical Planning.

Ahilan Sivaganesan1, Justin S Smith2, Han Jo Kim1

  • 1Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.

Neurospine
|January 6, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Evaluating cervical deformity requires detailed imaging analysis. Classification systems and dynamic films aid in understanding malalignment and planning surgical interventions for better patient outcomes.

Keywords:
Cervical deformityClassificationEvaluationSurgical planning

More Related Videos

Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
04:19

Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device

Published on: November 8, 2024

857
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

6.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 22, 2025

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
07:11

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants

Published on: May 23, 2020

7.7K
Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
04:19

Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device

Published on: November 8, 2024

857
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

6.8K

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedics
  • Neurosurgery
  • Spinal Surgery

Background:

  • Cervical deformity presents complex treatment challenges requiring intricate decision-making.
  • Accurate diagnosis relies on comprehensive patient history, physical examination, and quantitative imaging analysis.
  • Understanding the underlying drivers of deformity is crucial for effective management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the clinical and radiographic evaluation of cervical deformity.
  • To discuss emerging classification schemes for categorizing cervical deformity.
  • To outline surgical planning strategies based on deformity classification.

Main Methods:

  • Review of clinical assessment, including history and physical examination.
  • Analysis of various imaging modalities, emphasizing the importance of dynamic films.
  • Examination of current classification systems for cervical deformity.
  • Discussion of surgical planning principles tailored to specific deformity subgroups.

Main Results:

  • Dynamic films are essential for assessing compensatory extension reserve in patients with cervical deformity.
  • Established classification systems aid in identifying distinct subgroups of cervical deformity.
  • These subgroups exhibit unique characteristics that inform specific surgical treatment paradigms.

Conclusions:

  • A systematic approach combining clinical evaluation, advanced imaging, and classification is vital for managing cervical deformity.
  • Dynamic radiography plays a key role in understanding patient compensation mechanisms.
  • Tailored surgical planning based on classification improves treatment efficacy for cervical deformity.