Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 22, 2025

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
Published on: October 23, 2020
Competing risk analysis of cardiovascular/cerebrovascular death in T1/2 kidney cancer: a SEER database analysis
Xiaofei Mo1,2, Mingge Zhou1,2, Hui Yan1,2
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, 213003, Jiangsu, China.
Background:
Kidney cancer (KC) is associated with cardiovascular regulation disorder and easily leads to cardiovascular and cerebrovascular death (CCD), which is one of the major causes of death in patients with KC, especially those with T1/2 status. However, few studies have treated CCD as an independent outcome for analysis. We aimed to identify and evaluate the key factors associated with CCD in patients with T1/2 KC by competing risk analysis and compared these risk factors with those associated with kidney cancer-specific death (KCD) to offer some information for clinical management.
Methods:
A total of 45,117 patients diagnosed with first primary KC in T1/2 status were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. All patients were divided into the CCD group (n = 3087), KCD group (n = 3212), other events group (n = 6312) or alive group (n = 32,506). Patients' characteristics were estimated for their association with CCD or KCD by a competing risk model. Pearson's correlation coefficient and variance inflation factor (VIF) were used to detect collinearity between variables. Factors significantly correlated with CCD or KCD were used to create forest plots to compare their differences.
Results:
The competing risk analysis showed that age at diagnosis, race, AJCC T/N status, radiation therapy, chemotherapy and scope of lymph node represented different relationships to CCD than to KCD. In detail, age at diagnosis (over 74/1-50: HR = 9.525, 95% CI: 8.049-11.273), race (white/black: HR = 1.475, 95% CI: 1.334-1.632), AJCC T status (T2/T1: HR = 0.847, 95% CI: 0.758-0.946) and chemotherapy (received/unreceived: HR = 0.574, 95% CI: 0.347-0.949) were correlated significantly with CCD; age at diagnosis (over 74/1-50: HR = 3.205, 95% CI: 2.814-3.650), AJCC T/N status (T2/T1: HR = 2.259, 95% CI: 2.081-2.451 and N1/N0:HR = 3.347, 95% CI: 2.698-4.152), radiation therapy (received/unreceived: HR = 2.552, 95% CI: 1.946-3.346), chemotherapy (received/unreceived: HR = 2.896, 95% CI: 2.342-3.581) and scope of lymph nodes (1-3 regional lymph nodes removed/none: HR = 1.378, 95% CI: 1.206-1.575) were correlated significantly with KCD.
Conclusions:
We found that age at diagnosis, race, AJCC T status and chemotherapy as the independent risk factors associated with CCD were different from those associated with KCD.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Relative Risk
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...

