Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 22, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Examining the Factors Affecting PrEP Implementation Within Community-Based HIV Testing Sites in Florida: A Mixed
DeAnne Turner1, Elizabeth Lockhart2, Wei Wang3
1Yale AIDS Prevention Training Program (Y-APT), Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS (CIRA), Yale University, 135 College St. Suite 200, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA. deanne.turner@yale.edu.
Implementing pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in HIV testing sites is influenced by available resources and leadership. Addressing these contextual factors can improve PrEP program delivery by non-clinical staff.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Implementation Science
- HIV Prevention
Background:
- HIV testing and counseling sites are crucial for identifying individuals who could benefit from pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP).
- Non-clinical staff at these sites have a key role in discussing and referring clients for PrEP.
- Understanding the factors influencing PrEP implementation in these settings is essential for optimizing its uptake.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the contextual factors affecting the implementation of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) within HIV testing sites.
- To identify predictors of PrEP implementation using constructs from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).
Main Methods:
- Two generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze PrEP implementation.
- Qualitative interviews were conducted and analyzed thematically.
- Data integration was achieved through joint analysis and triangulation of quantitative and qualitative findings.
Main Results:
- Individual characteristics did not predict PrEP implementation, though qualitative data revealed varied knowledge levels.
- Within inner and outer settings, available resources and relevant priorities predicted PrEP implementation.
- Qualitative data highlighted the importance of resources, leadership, and cosmopolitanism in successful implementation.
Conclusions:
- Available resources and site priorities are key predictors of PrEP implementation in HIV testing settings.
- Addressing contextual factors, particularly resources and leadership, can enhance PrEP program delivery.
- Improving understanding and addressing implementation barriers can empower HIV testing staff to effectively offer PrEP services.
Related Concept Videos
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Nursing Implementation
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.
Factors Affecting Drug Response: Overview
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Factors Affecting Workability
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...

