Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 22, 2025

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
Published on: September 12, 2014
True Threats, Self-Defense, and the Second Amendment
Joseph Blocher1, Bardia Vaseghi1
1Joseph Blocher, J.D., is the Lanty L. Smith '67 Professor of Law at Duke Law School, and co-director of the Center for Firearms Law. Bardia Vaseghi is a student at Yale Law School, J.D. expected 2022.
Abstract:
Does the Second Amendment protect those who threaten others by negligently or recklessly wielding firearms? What line separates constitutionally legitimate gun displays from threatening activities that can be legally proscribed? This article finds guidance in the First Amendment doctrine of true threats, which permits punishment of "statements where the speaker means to communicate a serious expression of an intent to commit an act of unlawful violence to a particular individual or group of individual." The Second Amendment, like the First, should not be read to protect those who threaten unlawful violence. And to the degree that the constitution requires a culpable mental state (mens rea) in such circumstances, the appropriate standard should be recklessness.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Torts II
Torts III
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.
Secondary Motives: Affiliation Motivation and Aggression Motivation
Aggression
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
Torts I
Intentional...

