Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 22, 2025

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Assessing the Risks of Bleeding vs Thrombotic Events in Patients at High Bleeding Risk After Coronary Stent
Philip Urban1, John Gregson2, Ruth Owen2
1Hôpital de la Tour, Geneva, Switzerland.
New models predict major bleeding and myocardial infarction/stent thrombosis risks in high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). These tools aid in tailoring treatment strategies and antithrombotic regimens for better patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Risk Prediction
Background:
- Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who are at high bleeding risk present a significant therapeutic challenge due to concurrent risks of thrombotic complications.
- Balancing the risks of bleeding and thrombosis is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies in this patient population.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate prognostic models for predicting major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC] types 3-5) and myocardial infarction (MI) and/or stent thrombosis (ST) in patients at high bleeding risk undergoing PCI.
- To provide tools that assist in defining procedural strategies and antithrombotic regimens based on individual patient risk profiles.
Main Methods:
- Individual patient data from 6 studies (N=6641) of high bleeding risk patients undergoing PCI were analyzed.
- Forward, stepwise multivariable proportional hazards models were used to identify predictors of MI/ST and BARC types 3-5 bleeding.
- Models were validated using data from the ONYX ONE trial (N=1458).
Main Results:
- Two independent risk models were developed, identifying 8 predictors each for MI/ST and major bleeding, with 4 overlapping predictors.
- The models demonstrated moderate discrimination (C-statistics of 0.69 for MI/ST and 0.68 for bleeding), validated similarly in a separate cohort.
- Patients experiencing MI/ST had a 6.1-fold increased mortality risk, while those with major bleeding had a 3.7-fold increased risk compared to event-free patients.
Conclusions:
- Developed prognostic models can identify individual risks of major thrombotic and bleeding events in high bleeding risk patients undergoing PCI.
- These risk scores can help clinicians evaluate the trade-off between thrombotic and bleeding risks, guiding the selection of revascularization strategies and antithrombotic therapy.
- Future clinical application may involve smartphone-based tools to assess individual risk profiles and personalize treatment decisions.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT

